It’s just as much of an assumption to think it would stop, and given past examples the GOP doesn’t tend to stop initiatives when they switch figureheads.
and that democrats don’t exactly change foreign policy when they are in power. however, we seem to be seeing what’s more like the sundowning of a mad king than anything approaching what we could describe as “policy”
That’s the point, this isn’t true. They will find another.
But they’ll have to find it first. Vance isn’t it. At least all of this shit could cool down a little.
It won’t? The full-scale assault on Iran, lebanon and the free parts of palestine would just continue…
that’s a pretty big assumption
It’s just as much of an assumption to think it would stop, and given past examples the GOP doesn’t tend to stop initiatives when they switch figureheads.
and that democrats don’t exactly change foreign policy when they are in power. however, we seem to be seeing what’s more like the sundowning of a mad king than anything approaching what we could describe as “policy”
which will cause fractioning of the brand, which will likely make it unlikely for them to have this level of power again for at least a generation