• 𝕽𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖑@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      As cool as this truly is, what’s also wild is now this person doesn’t have the drastically higher chances of surviving Malaria! Sickle Cell requires both parents passing on a recessive gene that helps with Malaria. When one parent passes on the gene it doesn’t lead to sickle cell yet it provides the benefits against malaria 🤯

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        now this person doesn’t have the drastically higher chances of surviving Malaria

        Do they not?

        one parent passes on the gene it doesn’t lead to sickle cell yet it provides the benefits against malaria

        The can’t have edited all of the patient’s cells, just enough of them to produce enough normal non-sickle blood cells to cure the disease. Would the remaining cells which still prosess the sickle-cell gene provide any protection against Malaria?

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        His chances of catching malaria in New Orleans are pretty slim, so I think that’s a fair trade-off. :)

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Twice lucky, probably in a free trial and it worked.
    Editing stem cells in a lab sounds… expensive.

    For the others after him:
    Now you can get cured from sickle cell for only $12 000 000!