• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    This looks like Newsom is acting in bad faith.

    If Newsom actually wanted this tax in any form, he’d support the current California version, and advocate for a carve-out exception for those already taxed previously under California’s version from the future Federal version.

    Instead, he’s trying to torpedo the California one that actually has a chance at being implement.

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      He knows it won’t pass at the national level, so he doesn’t mind supporting it in that case.

      • echo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        There is that and the fact that it should be a national thing to shut down avoidance options.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s a lot of value to banishing billionaires from your state. If they don’t live somewhere, they’re going to be less tempted to spend money to influence the laws there.

        • cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          But we don’t want them here and California, except for the billionaires and their lackeys and orange county and Fresno and certain undesirable transients plaguing sacramento is a genuinely wonderful place to live if you’re not one of the fire-slaves or something.

          Fixing one of those problems would still be a success, and it would deny them something nice that they want. Which would also be nice.

      • Nautalax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can also be in the sense that if you enact it in California then they can pick up and leave for Texas or Florida and still mess up the country’s politics but leave California without the ability to get any taxes from them. Whereas if you enact it nationwide then they’d have to skip the country entirely to dodge it which would be more difficult and not advantage states that don’t agree.

        • TheGoldenV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          No one really leaves. Pack up and move to a shithole flyover state? Yeah right.

          Oh and if I’m wrong? Good.

          • Nautalax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            There was a net internal migration of ~300k people out of California last year, some mega rich have moved too. Red states gaining population and money get boosted electoral college votes and more political influence to sway the entire country rather than just their own states. They’re not disappearing into a vacuum unfortunately.