• Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did you read the article, dumb-dumb?

    Khan also said that a 5,000-page report by the UN’s Office of Internal Oversight Services had cleared him of all wrongdoing. Moreover, the ICC’s ‘Bureau’ – the ICC’s main oversight body – appointed three judges to digest the report. The judges confirmed on 21 March 2026 that there was not a single piece of evidence suggesting any misconduct by Khan.

    However the ICC board (which is not a judicial body) made the decision to remove him.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do you think sexual harassment perpetrated by high profile people is never covered up?

      If it was one woman, sure it’s possible it’s a disgruntled employee. When it’s multiple?

      And yeah the fact that they removed him speaks volumes. People a little closer to this guy than you and I are thinking “we gotta get rid of this guy.” Probably trying to salvage what’s left of the ICJ’s reputation.

      If the facts of the evidence is strong, it doesn’t really matter if this guy is replaced. In fact this guy has ab appearance of bias, and in a legal system even that appearance is disqualifying.

      • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the “ICC”, bud. You’ve been wrong from the start. Shut up and sit down Zionist shill.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh right, the ICJ is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about countries that go nowhere while the ICC is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about the leaders of countries that go nowhere. They’re totally different! LOL