• Deckname@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You’re breathing the same air as a terrorist!! 1!! 1!! 1!1!!! 1!!! You antisemite!

  • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What is this news source? They claim 21 US vassal states but don’t even bother listing them? Utter garbage.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    #believewomen unless the guy sexually harassing office staff is part of “the cause” in which case ignore women and assume they must be agents of the enemy.

    Yet another way y’all are exactly like MAGAs.

    • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Did you read the article, dumb-dumb?

      Khan also said that a 5,000-page report by the UN’s Office of Internal Oversight Services had cleared him of all wrongdoing. Moreover, the ICC’s ‘Bureau’ – the ICC’s main oversight body – appointed three judges to digest the report. The judges confirmed on 21 March 2026 that there was not a single piece of evidence suggesting any misconduct by Khan.

      However the ICC board (which is not a judicial body) made the decision to remove him.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Do you think sexual harassment perpetrated by high profile people is never covered up?

        If it was one woman, sure it’s possible it’s a disgruntled employee. When it’s multiple?

        And yeah the fact that they removed him speaks volumes. People a little closer to this guy than you and I are thinking “we gotta get rid of this guy.” Probably trying to salvage what’s left of the ICJ’s reputation.

        If the facts of the evidence is strong, it doesn’t really matter if this guy is replaced. In fact this guy has ab appearance of bias, and in a legal system even that appearance is disqualifying.

        • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s the “ICC”, bud. You’ve been wrong from the start. Shut up and sit down Zionist shill.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Oh right, the ICJ is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about countries that go nowhere while the ICC is the UN court in the Hague where they make bullshit claims about the leaders of countries that go nowhere. They’re totally different! LOL

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      #believewomen was always just a self-serving argument promoted by Biden and co. for political gain.

      What we should (and legally have) to believe is innocence until proven guilty.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What we should (and legally have) to believe is innocence until proven guilty.

        Do you believe Netanyahu is innocent until proven guilty?

        • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Of course. With the level of evidence the ICJ has against him, they can order an arrest; this should turn out to be a quick verdict.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Quick guilty verdict? That’s not a presumption of innocence.

            Do you think Trump arresting Maduro was a good thing? What criteria should be used? Should some court in Europe have jurisdiction over the world? It’s it even a legal system when it’s motivated by politics?

            Also Netanyahu isn’t going to be arrested. The ICJ doesn’t have an army to enforce their decrees on parts of the world that don’t recognise their legitimacy. Issuing these kinds of orders only hurt is legitimacy (don’t issue orders that won’t be followed!) and only creates an equivalence between their actions and Trump’s actions with Maduro.