The actual answer is that it violates the dignity of animals and humans. It’s so disgusting and grotesque that nobody even wants to read about this stupid hypothetical. Not even as a shitpost, nor as a snarky rejoinder to a shitpost. It’s literal gore. What the fuck is wrong with you OP.

That and health issues.

I can’t remember the Bible verse about not sticking your dick in roadkill.

And they are both right

It isn’t morally wrong but it is disgusting. For most of us, that’s enough to never do it, or even think about doing it. But I admit for some, they do need religion to keep them from fucking roadkill, apparently.

Morality doesn’t exist.

Morality is just Empathy re-branded by religion in order to be codified and used to cudgel uneducated medieval serfs.

What they preach about in not killing, not raping, not fucking deer, etc… etc… literally comes from simply giving the barest minimum of shits about the people around you.

Their problem however, is that Empathy not only predates their religion by hundreds of thousands of years (if not millions), but that Empathy is not limited to humans, which would mean that they’re no longer the creator’s “special little boy”.

So they rename it, put it into neat and easy little Mnemonic devices (lets call them sins) and then run around telling the uneducated peasants “don’t do this, don’t do that” even though most people weren’t doing those things anyway because most people have empathy and simply aren’t assholes.

Since the deer is dead, it can’t consent, which is rape. That is what an atheist would say.

Could be projection, but it’s more likely that christians think atheists are nothing but nihilistic hedonists that fuck and kill everything and anything. looks at bible oh yeah, that’s also projection.

I don’t know that I would say that it is wrong, morally. It is fucking disgusting though, like from a sanitary perspective, it is indicative of an aberrant psychology and poor judgement, likely detrimental to your health, it would have massive social consequences if people knew about it, and there are far more safe, healthy, and socially acceptable ways to achieve the same ends. So you objectively should not be doing that. But I don’t think that it is any more morally wrong to fuck a rotting carcass than than to eat it. I would still highly discourage both practices though.

“Without god, what’s to stop you from committing all the rape and murder you want?”

I already commit all the rape and murder I want, which is none.

Good point, it might not be immoral

It is, however, fucking disgusting and that’s one good reason not to do it.

And I thought the ubiquitous Christian baby was bad…

Unlike you, I do not get a boner from road kill. Maybe you should see a therapist about your necrophiliac beastiality.

Has my guy never seen the sheep intestine condoms? You can fuck a dead animal while fucking someone else at the same time!

I’ve met Christians that think like this. I think the “logic” goes something like this:

• God says not to do a lot of things because they’re wrong
• I try not to do those things, and some of them are totally gross
• Atheists don’t believe in God, so there’s nothing stopping them from doing those things, including the gross ones

The just totally miss that atheists generally don’t want to do those things any more than they do. It reminds me of what Penn Jillette said in an interview:

The question I get asked by religious people all the time is, without God, what’s to stop me from raping all I want? And my answer is: I do rape all I want. And the amount I want is zero. And I do murder all I want, and the amount I want is zero. The fact that these people think that if they didn’t have this person watching over them that they would go on killing, raping rampages is the most self-damning thing I can imagine. I don’t want to do that. Right now, without any god, I don’t want to jump across this table and strangle you. I have no desire to strangle you. I have no desire to flip you over and rape you.

I love how the poster suggests giving the atheist a logical fallacy…

They sure did…

Multiple…

(Also an ethical dilemma is not the same thing as a fallacy)