Another good one is to check the perspective lines. While Generative models are quite good at making perspective “real enough” to pass at a glance, but they struggle immensely with perfect perspective. Plus, its a good trick to use if you dont know the subject - I dont know what a Zamboni looks like so I could be fooled by something you’d catch.
It actually is pretty spot on with the machine itself, unless you ask it to have the dump tank up or basically anything other than “make an image of a Zamboni”. Here is a real photo of a 552 for reference:
It still has some wonk. Like its missing the brush on the board brush. And there is some missing/extra stuff on the top towards the operator. But in terms of broad strokes it passes the test I would say
Another good one is to check the perspective lines. While Generative models are quite good at making perspective “real enough” to pass at a glance, but they struggle immensely with perfect perspective. Plus, its a good trick to use if you dont know the subject - I dont know what a Zamboni looks like so I could be fooled by something you’d catch.
It actually is pretty spot on with the machine itself, unless you ask it to have the dump tank up or basically anything other than “make an image of a Zamboni”. Here is a real photo of a 552 for reference:
It still has some wonk. Like its missing the brush on the board brush. And there is some missing/extra stuff on the top towards the operator. But in terms of broad strokes it passes the test I would say