“Overall, we rate UN Watch Right Biased based on information and political positions that favor the right and Mostly Factual due to the use of poor sources that have failed fact checks.”
Man, you cannot, for the life of you, say one factual thing in this entire thread.
Why are you linking a borderline extremist news site that censors its writers and fabricates information? https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-intercept/
And the new york times is considered one of the most factual news sources. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
MBFC endorses UNWatch as credible.
UNWatch screams that the UN is Hamas.
Why would you use that garbage Zionist MBFC site?
Are you saying that the UN is Hamas?
“Overall, we rate UN Watch Right Biased based on information and political positions that favor the right and Mostly Factual due to the use of poor sources that have failed fact checks.”
Man, you cannot, for the life of you, say one factual thing in this entire thread.
I’m out. Haha.
Strange because I read:
UNwatch
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Being a Zionist must be very difficult when you deny reality.