silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoClimate extremistsdavewalker.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1330arrow-down1external-linkClimate extremistsdavewalker.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebob_wiley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·edit-21 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoBut all of this assumes no cost to continuing using oil. Because we don’t count the damages done to climate or our well-being in terms of money. If you include the externalities of fossil fuels, it’s very very worth it.
minus-squarebob_wiley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes of course I’m in favour of slavery… What do you think??? We already pay for most things with taxes. Like roads or the military. Somehow all that works out just fine. Meanwhile your solution is for everyone to go to depression era thinking… as if that is more realistic. And won’t need regulation too. But yes, global cooperation is indeed needed to solve climate change. There is no other way around it. And I never claimed otherwise?
minus-squareDessertStorms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s honestly quite scary that the idea of no money = slavery to these people.
minus-squareDessertStorms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoyes, only because profit is prioritised by a handful of people over the wellbeing of the planet and everyone on it, not because there is an actual lack of money (or even need for it, but I digress) to pay for these things.
Removed by mod
But all of this assumes no cost to continuing using oil. Because we don’t count the damages done to climate or our well-being in terms of money.
If you include the externalities of fossil fuels, it’s very very worth it.
Removed by mod
Yes of course I’m in favour of slavery… What do you think???
We already pay for most things with taxes. Like roads or the military. Somehow all that works out just fine.
Meanwhile your solution is for everyone to go to depression era thinking… as if that is more realistic. And won’t need regulation too.
But yes, global cooperation is indeed needed to solve climate change. There is no other way around it. And I never claimed otherwise?
It’s honestly quite scary that the idea of no money = slavery to these people.
yes,