• Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    9 months ago

    In this day and age, the ISP should also be on the list of things classified as “utilities” - it’s getting harder and harder to do anything useful without the internet. It’s become an essential service.

    • Deello@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      The governments treatment of ISPs has made other industries reconsider how they do business. Utilities as we know them will be going away soon. How long before USPS is sold?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s because he’d have to face the Letter Carriers union, in an organized labor market that has gotten extremely militant with strike culture

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        USPS fan here. BIG time fan.

        There will be riots in the streets before the postal service is privatized. Who will go for that?

        Democrats don’t want it. Country Republican voters would be outraged in minutes if their service was cut off or the price spiked. Those voters will notice fast. And they’ll take note faster than city people. LOL, their mailperson may be the one government official they know personally, and count on.

        We’re talking about a gigantic federal agency, gigantic. The USPS is simply too important to be fucked with. Anymore than we have already…

        • HotDogFingies@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          My dumbass Republican father wants to do away with USPS entirely and rely solely on existing private businesses, such as FedEx or UPS.

          He lives in Tucson, AZ. So, not exactly country. But he’s fucking stupid.

          • fed0sine@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I completely understand your experience. I am a resident of Tucson and we seem to be a bastion of purple in the sea of red that is Arizona.

            There are plenty of InfoWarrior rides and the occasional coal-roller can be found cruising the streets.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          normally I’d completely agree with you… but… DeJoy has been hatefucking the USPS for 4 years and we can’t seem to get rid of him - conservatives or libs. so…

          I dunno what the fuck to do, I just know nothing so far has worked.

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Country Republican voters would be outraged in minutes if their service was cut off or the price spiked.

          What you’re missing here is that it takes a little while for things to go to shit. What you do as a smart conservative (bit of an oxymoron, I admit) is implement this towards the end of your term so that the effect will come when the democrat is in power in the next term.

        • Deello@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          “In order to stop the Democrats from trying to steal another election by mail in ballots we will be shutting down the USPS and replacing it with a bigger more better delivery service. Why try to kick out the crooked left when we can’t start fresh with the best deliver-ers of packages and mail in the business. Only the finest of delivery men and women that believe in true American values.”

          -Trump probably

          I agree with what you’re saying but I also feel you are underestimating how gullible the base is AND how determined the GOP is to pass things once in power. They prefer the slow boil method.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Much as I don’t like ISPs, and I’ve worked for a few, in the field and on the phones, I shudder to think of our government running one. Yes, they should absolutely be classed as utilities. But I don’t want the government involved in actual operations. That’s a nightmare in 12 different ways.

      It’s a weird business space. Despite being a monopoly in most American markets, they keep expanding service, for no extra cost. I have no idea why they’re doing this.

      I live on the edge of town in a redneck suburb. No reason to improve service out here, they’re the only real game in town. Yet I keep getting faster and faster speeds for no extra cost.

      Anyone know what’s driving improvements without competition? Or is there competition I’m not seeing?

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Honestly, as an Aussie who has the NBN, it actually works surprisingly well, despite its rocky start and I can guarantee it’s better than the previous setup we had, which was either Telstra/Optus cable for way too much money or you’d be stuck with cheap slow ~800kbps ADSL - and that’s if you could even get wired internet. N In fact, despite the massive fuckup that was the initial rollout (things tend get fucked up when the government repeatedly changes hands mid-planning and implementation stages) it’s actually doing quite well.

        NBN sells its service through the ISPs at a set cost, the ISPs then compete for profit and add-ons - the speed plans are (up/down) Basic, (12/0.8). Basic II, (25/4), Standard(50/17), Fast(100/17), Superfast(250/22), ultrafast(700/40), so you’re still buying it through an ISP, but you can expect a consistent pricing (though I swear the larger ISPs are always overpriced)

        Speed plans are also dictated by what kind of connection the NBN offers in your neighbourhood - my neighbourhood recently upgraded, and supports all of them, but before I was limited to Fast speeds - super and ultra weren’t available, as a matter of fact, we’re still on Fast, even though there are higher options now, dad sees no reason to pay more.

        It’s a bit different for America - lots more people, and plenty of areas where gigabit is available, unlike Australia which had one of the worst internet speeds on earth. Already having good speeds makes it harder for a government to justify spending the money on something like the NBN

        But the one thing the NBN and the buyout of all the original landlines and cable networks, as well as the construction of the NBN fiber networks did, is open up the market for hundreds of smaller ISPs, we now have so much choice for ISPs that the two selling points people look for when choosing are price and customer service, not speed as that’s practically guaranteed. People flip between them for better deals all the time.

        However some places only have access to fixed wireless and they often get their own, honestly pretty inconsistent and abysmal download speeds 2-11, 2-23, 2-75 - note that upload speeds aren’t often advertised and the base speed is pretty shit - but before NBN they were stuck with mobile data or nothing, so it’s still potentially an upgrade - provided you’re not in an area where 2mbps is common.