This would be a good opportunity to provide a thoughtful, sane, and coherent response to voice your opinion on the future regulation policies for AI to counter the fearmongering.

How to submit a comment: https://www.regulations.gov/document/NTIA-2023-0009-0001

All electronic public comments on this action, identified by Regulations.gov docket number NTIA–2023–0009, may be submitted through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. The docket established for this request for comment can be found at www.Regulations.gov, NTIA–2023–0009. To make a submission, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Additional instructions can be found in the “Instructions” section below, after “Supplementary Information.”

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Well the open source community should have a near zero unified opinion on how a broad technology should be centrally managed. Individual groups or persons should hold their own positions.

    This is like saying binary search, or encryption should be regulated. LLM is just a particular technology. A fundamental thing. It’s just math and systems.

    Products and derivates may be another thing (like Perhaps creating deepfakes of living people, for example, or training a model on copyright material)