It’s not special rights, it’s project materials approved by leadership, and noted on a published and approved feature roadmap
Edit assuming requisitioning a scaled db replica is “special” is kinda aligned with the meme lol
It’s not special rights, it’s project materials approved by leadership, and noted on a published and approved feature roadmap
Edit assuming requisitioning a scaled db replica is “special” is kinda aligned with the meme lol
Clarifying:
The government pays them a reduced salary: 70% of their wage. Tesla does not pay the other 30 during that time
Even with more info these articles just devolve into
Mario man bad but we all still love Mario? New Zelda in the spring be sure to line up now.
Lol it’s not a ban, it’s a comment that suggests these articles are of poor quality
Meh it’s usually for shitty companies that expect their devs to write real software, ssh into things, access databases, but put the same hurdles in front of them as joeblow from sales who can’t use an ipad to buy a sandwich without clicking a phishing link. So every new project is slowed down cause it takes weeks of emails and teams conversations to get a damn db sandbox and it’s annoying.
On the other hand IT doesn’t know you and has millions of issues to attend to
And certainly to those who attack federal workers on the topic of elections. Seems like a nice ticket to the “no more politics for you” box
A trump win represents a faster and larger right shift, with judicial and electoral erosions, reducing the chance of future progress.
As discussion, I’m not her base. But I argue about voting strategy with a Harris conclusion.
I’m deeply unsatisfied with the democratic position on Gaza and beyond. But I’m in the anti trump base. I believe global well being, including in Gaza will be significantly worse if he gets a second term.
I will vote for any competitive, viable candidate that is left of trump, the more left the better. I will not vote for an academic choice that has no chance of winning, and is only a spoiler. Without ejection reform, and something like proportional representation, I believe one should choose based on harm reduction, even if the choice is very unsavory.
Thanks for posting why, I think it’s good to see the reason in the comments, not just the log
Obviously the biggest way to reduce impact is to not exist, and certainly not reproduce.
Mind, I’m not pointing that phrase at you, I’m speaking about any human.
Voting rights =/= dietary choices.
One thing is others imposing a lack of autonomy on others (not allowing certain people to vote)
The other thing is a personal choice that no one is stopping you from making.
It’s called the Atlantic/Pacific oceans sport
Hah it’s already sensitized https://lemm.ee/comment/15063493
Not a viable option.
The deer knows where it lives, because it knows where it livesn’t.
Sure but they can buy “art”
Which, more. Say a name, or nothing else.
🗣️🧠
Eh they know they live in a very precarious perch with a population that young and disenfranchised. It’s classic authoritarian tactics to make a token nod to the masses every now and again
Lol hey if you come over you might find me spreading my cheeks for ya nbd jk. But actually? Hah just foolin but, well 👉👈