Surprisingly this was written by a REPUBLICAN. Not what I’d expect but hey, if it means next time some lady threatens to stab a Starbucks barista for not putting enough caramel in her Frappuccino she gets fined out the ass I’m for it.

  • stephen@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    I spent more than fifteen years in jobs covered by this bill. I’m unclear as to why I someone assailing me should get a worse penalty than if they were hitting the person running a forklift or behind a non customer facing desk somewhere.

    • TUMBLE_BUS [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      People in those positions are less likely to face direct customer hostility shrug-outta-hecks

      Idk, I think making the penalty steeper for people attack some of the most common victims of this abuse could have a deterring effect.

      • regul [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        stiffer penalties have negligible effect on crime

        actually getting caught does

        Louisiana is the most incarcerated state in the nation (which makes it one of, if not the, most-incarcerated place on earth). Longer sentences just means more people in jail for longer to pick cotton at Angola.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          stiffer penalties have negligible effect on crime

          on petty interpersonal crime and heat of the moment rages. I’m all for legal torturous deaths for financial criminals or the Sacklers.