Except that your statement becomes incrementally more false every day.
Sure, it’s still mostly true. Likely in the 80% range, at most. But give it another year or two of additional AI improvements, and it won’t be anymore.
Hell, even now I’ve had to start filtering videos more on the content’s behaviour - whether it is realistic or not - than any AI oopsies like sudden changes in the background.
Except that your statement becomes incrementally more false every day.
Sure, it’s still mostly true. Likely in the 80% range, at most. But give it another year or two of additional AI improvements, and it won’t be anymore.
Hell, even now I’ve had to start filtering videos more on the content’s behaviour - whether it is realistic or not - than any AI oopsies like sudden changes in the background.
Sounds like there will always be things you don’t immediately understand and falsely attribute to AI.
You’re holding a mirror up and seeing your own reflection, there.
I work in the IT industry. I am embedded into this bullshit quite deeply. I know what to look for and can see just how pervasive it’s getting.
You thought a picture of a model was an AI interpretation of a photo from the middle ages.
So I doubt that whole-heartedly.
I can believe its amped your paranoia though.
What TF are you smoking? I never said anything of the kind.
Next time, compare the usernames of the commenters instead of making wild, unsupported accusations.
Oh yeah you did jump in there didnt you, good point.
Well anyway, the overall point stands.