This is my thread people, move along
If they keep jailing people for protesting, we should send in Shrekbots with strapons and tell them to complete the job at any cost.
But, thankfully, they were wise enough to only jail for a day. Also, be more creative, I know a certain image on the sodium site that would instill grave fear.
But we don’t send that… Yet.
Shrap-ons was right there dude.
You take it if you take it right with shrap ons. Thems is the rough ones, if I 'member correctly.
Yet the 34 count felon, rapist, traitor, document thief among other likely crimes, was not held in jail at all, just got his silly pic he sells now.
As a former columbus resident I’m gonna guess this is the rooster. Sounds up his alley.
Edit: ayy
The blogger, D.J. Byrnes, runs The Rooster political website.
The Shrek image may have been crude or vulgar. But in context, there is no serious argument Byrnes sent it to arouse anyone’s sexual interest.
Speak for yourself!
Beging arrested for enjoying a succulent cartoon dick?
That was my mother’s before it was on a rollodex celluloid print-out. Boy, they don’t make them like they used to.
So uhh… Is it ya know… Big?
Why do you think he wears pants instead of a loincloth?
deleted by creator
Fiona being cursed to turn into an ogre at night was a blessing in disguise.
I want a big fat fucking ogre gunt pussy in my face right now, I want to munch on that shit like I’m doing the upholstery on the piece until straight-ass suffocated dead, blue in the face. That would make my life, I think.
Okay so this is some Kentucky Fried Bullshit.
I thought we lived in 'Murica, mkay?
Kentucky don’t fuck that way I find
what the fuck
That is not even close to an appropriate response, bro. Get with the program or get scrambled eggs and get gravy and get badger cream but don’t mix your stank Americano Nazi protoantinaturalization movement in with this shit. You have problems, bro. People always tell me I have problems, too. We can be friends! But I don’t listen to those people who say I have problems because I know who smacks javelins at the end of the day, y’know?
What the fuck are you even talking about? Ger outta his face bro!
What do you mean not the onion? I have it on good authority ogres are like onions.
Onions have balls or something. I haven’t seen the movie in a while. Fuck, I was ten. Fuck, I saw it with Kathy’s kids. Oooh, that’s why I have a Shrek +4 resistance! None of the Shrek memes from early 4chan worked on hypnotizing me because my father’s brianizing of me, the most of which allowed me to excedively perceive in higher order angular metrics to marifold back into itself to make the whole characterization of myself a reflection that told me my own way to fancy, and thus I am.
You okay buddy?
I mean, y’know, I very much wanna munch on some very fresh vaginal cunt, but otherwise I am ok, I suppose.
They stink?
they saute pretty nice in butter
Ogres are like Onions, says Shrek to Donkey
“They stink?” Says Donkey to Shrek.
Enough to make you cry.
Layers, like parfait
I have to see Trump’s fat ass in the news every day, can we get a criminal complaint about how that is harassment to our fucking eyes?
Biden shit his diaper. It’s not Trump’s fault.
I now have the image of Biden standing behind Trump with his bare back turned towards him, pulling on the back of Orange Mussolinis diaper to take a shit grinning.
SFW depiction of the situation:
And ears and brains
the revolution will not be televised but…shrek dicks will be sent?
The Shrekvolution*
Tired: tactics
Wired: Shrekdicks
Ik this won’t be a popular take because, as evidenced by this very comment section even, critical thinking isn’t popular, but this is sexual harassment. Sending people porn non-consentually is sexual harassment. Yes, even when the person you’re sexually harassing a piece of shit themselves, is that seriously a hard concept to grasp?? This dude is a piece of shit too if he thinks it’s okay to send someone porn without consent.
EDIT: Harassment not assault.
Generally, harassment is a course of conduct over a period of time, not a one-off. The bar for a one-off encounter being harassment of any kind is high, with good reason.
That reason, to me, is that any reasonable person should be robust enough that all but the most serious, malicious communication should be something they can shrug off without much ill effect if it’s a single isolated message. Getting a picture of a wanking cartoon character and a disparaging message isn’t going to be pleasant for most people, sure, but if that’s it?
The logic behind punishment for sexual harassment is not - or should not - be any different from the logic behind punishment for non-sexual harassment; it should be proportional to the harm caused, and it should take the same standard of a “person of reasonable firmness” or whatever the legalese is.
No, this is constitutionally protected political speech, as any court in the country will find when this winds up in front of them.
Sending people porn non-consentually is sexual harassment.
Questionable, but even granting that, public figures like politicians are a legally distinct kind of people who have to meet a much higher bar to claim communication is harassment, and this is a huge nothingburger. Larry Flynt is laughing from his grave.
These politicians have no idear what power mankind has at our fingertips. The ability to teleotransplace pornography into the enemy’s mind has been mastered by myself, as I am a top-secret American unit of protocol of the psychic variety, I stare at goats n shit, y’know? I don’t kill them, I just make them ejaculate. It’s kinder, I think. More difficult, too. But I surpassed Jedi and now I need to assemble a tea of ace roginators who can handle the role of agency to be as one is an agent as I are. But I can beam tits into Chinese terrorists at a moments notice. We are in WWIII right now. Just follow me and we gun get outta this aight, aight?
Did you read the linked article?
If so, could you be so kind as to speak to why you disagree with its unusually thorough and detailed legal analysis of the matter at hand?
The Shrek image may have been crude or vulgar. But in context, there is no serious argument Byrnes sent it to arouse anyone’s sexual interest, let alone that it satisfies the Miller test. Byrnes sent it to another adult, reportedly accompanied by political commentary describing Cirino as “Young Mussolini.” That’s protected political mockery, not obscenity.
Did you read the linked article?
Oh, the sides do orbit, know what I mean, brother?
i can’t take an article or author serious when they argue shreenis is not titillating.
That bish hot mid type robo pussy. I really just want to bury my face in between some fat ladies thighs. I am all giddy.
Look, I didn’t flash my dong to everyone in the train to arouse anyone’s sexual interest so there’s no serious argument it was obscene
Well, I did flash my dong to everyone in the gravy train explicitly to arouse sexual interest, which is the same reason I now turn the subject to testicular torsion. You’re gunna feel this. Brace yourself, and bless your heart!
deleted by creator
Dicks are irrelevant. If you can genuinely look at the picture in that article and call it “porn” you’re even weirder than the fascist piece of shit it was sent to mock.
It damn sure wouldn’t meet any legal definition.
For someone who started off their diatribe by accusing everyone else of lacking critical thinking skills, you damn sure have t bothered to address any of the counterpoints or analysis anyone else has brought up. It’s almost like you lack critical thinking skills and are just reacting to vibes.
Don’t call a dick dicker a fascist. Like, these ain’t the same lasagna, hunny
deleted by creator
spreading rape apologia whether you know it or not.
Kinda rich coming from someone whose definition of sexual assault is so broad (and thereby so cheapened) that it includes sending cartoon dicks to politicians.
I wonder how this person would qualify me touching my junk at the urinal. Since it involves touching an exposed penis, I suppose they would classify urinal usage as “public masturbation” and “sexual harassment” if anyone else is in the bathroom.
Hell, according to them you’re probably already a rapist for writing the word “penis” without getting consent from everyone in the thread.
By god, you’re right! Off to the gulag with me.
deleted by creator
Ha! People who can’t tell morals from ethics will argue with lawyers and claim the lawyers are fake, all day. No one knows more than a YouTube grad!
Wym?
Morally, I’m neutral about the act of sending the photo. It’s crass but was sent to a GOP politician, so big shrug.
Ethically, I think it violates the general principle of “don’t be a dick”, but see it as a nothingburger in the grand scheme of things.
Semantically, I don’t think it’s sexual (*in the sense of anyone getting their rocks off) in any way, shape, or form, nor credibly assault. I don’t think the photo as shown in the article is remotely distressing to anyone imaginable except a deeply-repressed GOP closet case.
Sexual harassment, not assault
True, edited the original comment to reflect this.
deleted by creator
Nobody coming off well in this story.
Feels like everyone should make all their avatars Shrek’s penis.
Ogres got them underscrotes, 'member?
I would in a heartbeat if just for a day or two, but I suspect it’s not allowed?
EDIT: I did it, but I pixelated it. Hopefully I won’t get banned for that.
Wing the change you want to see in the world! Respect!
Sounds like the only his-assment the senator can handle fits in a 3.5 inch floppy dick drive.
