• emptyother@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I cant see Ozymandias as a good guy. At all. None of the “heroes” are, but Oz was the worst of them.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I should re-read it, but the impression I got was that Oz was the epitome of this thread’s topic. A real “ends justify the means” villain, where his end goal is to save the world from itself by giving it a common enemy to vanquish. And he does it. In terms of the classical trolley problem, he pulled the lever to kill 1 instead of doing nothing and allowing 5 to die. Am I misremembering?

        • zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That’s roughly right, but that doesn’t make him in any meaningful way “good”. Of course I also don’t think anyone who decided to drop the bombs on Japan was a “good guy”. But maybe that’s why I’m not a pure utilitarian.

        • emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Veidt asked the precognitive being if his plans for utopia would come to be, and if it was all worth it in the end. Osterman cryptically responded by saying “Nothing ever ends”, and teleported away leaving Veidt once again in doubt as to whether or not his plan was successful.

          From what I understood, he spent the whole story acting super-sure about what would happen if he did nothing, and how he alone could fix it. But in the end of the comic, this showed he had doubts. Veidt didnt have precognition, just very good prediction. But also an over-inflated ego. He killed a lot of people for a “maybe”.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        In the movie the only one I would’ve considered good was Rorschach. He was the only one who only made personal sacrifices to save people.

        I mean dude legit let himself be killed because he couldn’t live with not telling the world what Ozymandius actually did.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Rorschach being good is debatable, he’s a Batman like vigilante who hasn’t the ‘no killing’ rule, which is dubious.

          But the reason he chose death was (in my humble opinion) that he realized Veidt had found the solution, that would bring peace and create a world he would be useless in.

          This point is made by the ultra nationalist frontiersman publication he sent his diary to. They complain that they have nothing to write about as the world was united in boring peace, this is when the burger munching intern gets the assignment to pull something out of the loonie pile.

      • mobius_slip@beehaw.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Veidt would never consider himself the good guy for what he did, but I think that’s what makes the writing so excellent.

    • The_wild_card@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah ozymandies was kind of an ass regardless . Did he solve a big problem ? Yes . Was he a good guy ? Far from it.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I bought the book just this weekend. Until now I only watched the movie. Looking forward to reading it!