• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re not thinking clearly. Intent is irrelevant, it can’t be known in this example. Got it?

    Just in case, here it is again. Intent is irrelevant.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But you defined the intent in your previous comment and laws/courts take intent into account when determining whether they’ve been violated or not.

      If it can’t be known then your entire question/scenario is irrelevant and pointless because it could never apply to the real world. For someone who keeps talking about confusion and not following the conversation, you seem to lack even a basic understanding of what’s being talked about.