• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t, actually. You pay all of your workers more so some of them might buy your product, maybe?

    The increase in wages for everyone will help, but then capitalists have no choice to attract labor. See: the wages now adjusted vs. the inflation

    https://www.bls.gov/charts/usual-weekly-earnings/usual-weekly-earnings-over-time-total-men-women.htm#

    This chart shows the median wage has gone up since the pandemic, even if using 2023 dollars

    So the wages in the US are better than they have ever been, even inflation adjusted. You can go back as long as you want, they were not higher in the 50s, contrary to popular belief

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the wages in the US are better than they have ever been, even inflation adjusted. You can go back as long as you want, they were not higher in the 50s, contrary to popular belief

      That’s just obviously false. Are you saying people who could pay for college by working summer jobs, and who could buy a car and house and raise a family on a single income were making less than people today who spend decades paying off student loans, and who can barely afford rent on a one-bedroom apartment?

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but people pining for the lifestyle of the 50s forget they are looking at the top 10% of incomes. Life in the 50s wasn’t that good compared to now for the AVERAGE person

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except they had things like the G.I. bill which gave them money to go to college or buy a house and improve their lives. Every man who was in the military in WWII had that as an option. Maybe some didn’t utilize it, but that was by choice. If you include their spouses and children, that’s way more than 10% of the population.

              Wages were comparatively higher too.

              But I don’t know anyone on the left pining for the lifestyle of the 1950s, that’s something conservatives want. I wouldn’t mind the wages of the 1950s (adjusted for inflation) and I wouldn’t mind taxing the rich at 90%, but I sure would mind the racism and the sexism.