• huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you don’t build shitty apartments for the rich they’ll just gentrify poor areas.

      More housing is more housing.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is downtown Brooklyn - NYC. Building the apartments in your image would lower density where this skyscraper is being built.

          Luxury buildings in downtown Brooklyn are not for the super rich - they’re for the 1%ers who work at banks downtown, and will almost certainly be rental units which are pretty constantly booked.

          You don’t get how housing constrained NYC is.

            • huginn@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              We’re talking about Brooklyn NY

              Do you know a single thing about Brooklyn NY?

              Cause you don’t sound like you know a single thing about Brooklyn NY. Or about what it means to be housing constrained.

                • huginn@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Ok so you don’t know what you’re talking about.

                  I live in Brooklyn. While the transit could use some expansions it’s not only the best transit system in the USA it also has the most subway stations of any transit system on earth.

                  If that hasn’t fixed housing affordability what’s your proposed solution?

                  What’s that? Oh density? Ok cool glad we agree. Let’s build skyscrapers.