We’re talking actions limited to something one human could achieve - so not wishes, but could be something amazing or rare like “become president”

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly? Petition the government to establish a tax function that starts at 0% and approaches 100% the more income you make. So by the time you’re making like 5 million a year, that 5 millionth dollar is taxed at like 99.9%. And make that a fucking constitutional amendment, so rich assholes couldn’t change it. And make it illegal to use your stock as collateral for a loan, or just consider loans as income. And capital gains count. Basically guarantee that the 1% actually pay into the system they take so much from.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would petition the government to make lobbyism illegal. Maybe this could be the start for cracking down on corruption more successfully…

    • Soulcreator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      One of the big issues I see with that proposal is that at some point, due to inflation an annual income in the ball park of 5 million dollars a year will be considered ‘middle class’. And then the average person will be hit with substantial taxes from a then archaic tax law.

      At that point you’ll need a constitutional amendment to shift the goal post which is nearly impossible to do such. (At least at this moment in time it is.)

      At that point the budget would likely have finally balanced itself out due to the higher tax rates. So of course there will probably be politicians arguing against making this change as it will effectively kill the federal budget, because shifting the tax laws will mean the government will be taking in substantially less.

      It’s a super well intentioned idea at the moment but it’s really a disaster in the making for a future generation.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You could tie it to a defined benchmark like X multiples of the current cost of living.

        In the Mondragon cooperative (last I knew) compensation per role is defined as a multiple of some common base rate, and the chief executive will never make more than a certain amount over the lowest paid employee.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Progressive tax is normal in most functional countries, it’s not rocket science.

        Basically you define X as a base sum that needs to be controlled for inflation. Minimum wage can be 2X, whereas 100% taxation might be reached at an income of 300X. In this scenario, nobody could earn more than 150 times minimum wage, and manipulating the calculation of X to make the rich richer would also benefit everyone else.

        A bigger challenge is that billionaire scum tend not to have income, only loans, so they don’t pay tax at all. But that’s also easily fixed if there’s political will.