• Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t know anything. There’s a reason that the real name of “bears” is taboo in many cultures. Just the act of saying its true name made the ancients shit their pants in fear of accidently summoning one. Bears are no joke. They kill on a whim. You can’t reason with bears. You can’t plead with bears. Bears are equal opportunity killers. They kill men, women, children, trans, straight, queer, ponybros, attack helicopters all the same. Your only chance is to make yourself appear too much a hassle that they rather go eat something else. Let all these women and men who approve of the OP’s post be tested irl. See if they will sing the same tune.

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been in the woods, alone, with bears in the same woods, countless times, and I clearly haven’t been eaten.

      I mean, you even say in your post that being too much of a hassle to eat is all you need to do. Can’t say that any men I’ve ever talked to wanted to have less sex with me when I indicated I’m a hassle to eat.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’ve gone hiking. I’m not like going to go pet the bear, I’m going to give it a huge ass berth and be grateful it won’t get angry at me for doing so

    • yuri@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are so whacky a person that this took genuine effort to determine whether or not it’s satire. I know when you typed that up it probably seemed hard hitting and effective, but I’m just imagining someone earnestly saying “You don’t know anything.” as an OPENER and I cannot stop laughing about it.

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        To me it’s the same as people opening with “No.” and then explaining why the previous person’s statement is flawed. The only time that’s a valid opener is when the previous statement was clearly a yes or no question, otherwise it’s blatantly rude and abrasive. And extremely common on here.