• bluGill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guns are designed to kill deer, ducks, and other animals that I want to kill. That they can kill humans is not intentional.

    That argument isn’t much different from the argument that cars are for getting around and that they can kill is not intentional. If you care about death, then by every metric you need to ban cars first.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Humans are animals and some people seem to like killing them. By all means, let’s mandate licensing and insurance to own guns. No one seems to have a problem with those being requirements for cars.

      Billions of dollars have been and are being spent to make cars less likely to kill people. But they have actual uses outside destroying things, unlike guns.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a liberal gun owner who carries a concealed handgun, I say bullshit. You can’t say that as a blanket statement. Handguns are meant to kill people, first and foremost. Military rifles are designed to kill people, period, because the military is not in the business of hunting. The vast majority of guns ever created were created to allow for easier killing of human beings. To argue anything else is disingenuous. I facetiously argued against that point in another post in this thread, but only to illustrate that the design is irrelevant to the usage. Nobody buys a handgun to kill deer or ducks.