I thought we should bring some attention to this.

  • Logical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Misleading title. Not incorrect, but it is based on what the source of income is, it is not about how rich you are relative to the rest of the population. The title makes it sound like if you make a certain amount of money, your tax rate is lowered. Alternatively, it sounds like the richest Dutch are evading 12% worth of taxes. But neither of these are true statements AFAIK, and either way they aren’t made in the article, so the title is misleading.

    Edit: Changed “the top 1%” to “the richest Dutch”.

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      I mean, it seems they want to focus on the outcome not the reason so the title is pretty much on point.

    • radfrogOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      29 days ago

      I just copied the title as per the community rules

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Not misleading, no one misunderstands

      This is the same thing we’ve been complaining about in the US:

      • tax rate is progressive, to a point, but only for “regular income”
      • wealthy pay lower rates by virtue of “different types of wealth/income” that the rest of us really can’t take advantage of.
      • also denigrated as “loopholes” to avoid taxes while staying within the law, only available to the wealthy
      • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Not misleading, no one misunderstands

        Speak for yourself, I misunderstood. I thought that income above a certain point was taxed at 28%.