• MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article:

    “The company said that if it were to abandon its business and brands in Russia, “they would be appropriated – and then operated – by the Russian state”. Unilever said it had not been able to find a way to sell the business that “avoids the Russian state potentially gaining further benefit, and which safeguards our people”. It said in that light, continuing to run the business with “strict constraints” was the best option.”

    Of course they are making profits there. But I suspect if they simply exit, that those profits would be made by whoever takes the business. Which would be some of the Kremlin oligarchs. It is “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation.

    • Incoherent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s not. Unilever owns the supply chain and this should stop too. it is just keeping this going until sanctions are lifted and then being the only one present. Unilever has shown multiple times they are in it for the shareholders all the way.

      • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unilever created its empire using Congolese slave labor under Belgian control between 1911 and 1945. Genocide and human rights abuses are literally built into the foundation of the company. Don’t believe their bullshit PR speak.

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just an excuse. You should never take corporate PR at their word. Especially if it boils down to “We have no choice but to continue making tons of money”.