PugJesus@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Manslaughterlemmy.worldimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down114
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageManslaughterlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·2 年前So words didnt exist before dictionaries (or writing, for that matter)? Pick up a brain sometime.
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-22 年前No im just not moronic enough to believe words werent a thing before dictionaries.
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 年前Also: LatinX is literally in the merriam-webster dictionary https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Latinx That doesnt mean that i use it, but by your logic, maybe you should
minus-squareSidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 年前Cool, so can we now agree that believing dictionaries are a prerequisite for language is ridiculous? I know it and you know it, no matter how many times you try to evade the question by making dumb accusations.
So words didnt exist before dictionaries (or writing, for that matter)? Pick up a brain sometime.
Removed by mod
No im just not moronic enough to believe words werent a thing before dictionaries.
Also: LatinX is literally in the merriam-webster dictionary
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Latinx
That doesnt mean that i use it, but by your logic, maybe you should
Removed by mod
Cool, so can we now agree that believing dictionaries are a prerequisite for language is ridiculous? I know it and you know it, no matter how many times you try to evade the question by making dumb accusations.