• Fox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    What incentive is there to keep working at a 90% tax burden?

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well if they stop working they make 0. 10% of any income is still more than zero, and this would likely be bracketed so high that there’d be at least a million or two in lower tax bands.

      Edit: also strictly, the comment you replied to said “the wealthy” this could refer to a wealth tax rather than an income tax, where stopping working would just remove the income but not affect the tax burden at all—i.e. a pretty terrible idea if you want to remain wealthy

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What incentive is there to keep working at a 90% tax burden?

      Why do people volunteer for free?

      The Beatles’ “Taxman” refers to a 95% tax rate that they were complaining about. Yet they still went on to produce more records and earn more money (and yes, work).

      If someone has enough money to live a life of luxury, they’ll keep doing what they do to earn that life of luxury.

      • Fox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        People volunteer for causes they think are worthy. I would never do the work I get paid to do for free or for 10% of gross pay. I’d just find a less stressful job, work way less and make about the same.

          • Fox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The issue is that right now I’m willing to put in the extra effort for the return early in my career. If the government were to effectively cap income potential, some workers who would otherwise be more productive (or who perform a highly specialized service) will not bother, creating a labor shortage and increasing costs. Not a smart move if you’re a country with an inflation problem that’s been trending very close to full employment.

            It would also make occupations like medicine that have long runways to earning even less attractive.

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Money is not the only motivator.

              As well, someone in the top tax bracket paying 95% tax on their income over $500,000 is still making a lot more than someone in the bottom tax bracket paying effectively 0% tax.

    • iamdisillusioned@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one makes that much money through work, it is through investments. Remove social security tax limits and beef up our nationalized retirement systems then tax investments to death. I don’t care if people are disincentivised from investing in businesses that don’t make any money. I know I’ll ruffle some feathers with this but I truly believe all space travel investments should be redirected to something that can make an immediate difference for those already on the planet, like healthcare or services for those effected by climate change.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fame and glory? You think Elon Musk notices an extra billion dollars here and there, or do you think he likes being the Lord of X and the Master of Tesla?