If they’ve got a 0% chance of winning then you’re throwing your vote away and paving the way for the worst candidate. As I mentioned, FPTP reduces the number of viable candidates, but you still have a choice.
If they’ve got a 0% chance of winning then you’re throwing your vote away and paving the way for the worst candidate. As I mentioned, FPTP reduces the number of viable candidates, but you still have a choice.
and? Just vote for the candidate who best represents you. Bonus points if they want election reform.
I wish some politicians, artists, and scientists that I used to follow used Mastodon.
???
FPTP reduces your options to 2 (sometimes 3) and one of the options literally holds the stances you express worry about.
Have you tried voting for the party that wants to remove corruption and expand the packed court?
So if an average of 2-3 people are in a home there are enough. Since our current system puts home ownership just out of reach, selling former rental properties and properties owned by overseas investors would probably be the bump we need.
I’m worried that large developments could be harmful to the environment and a waste of resources.
TBH I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re not being targeted at all but rather align perfectly with the real target audience: lonely, expendable income, low intelligence, low understanding of tech or finance, aging population.
Fixed how? The only two posts from here that I’ve seen in a long while were this one and an anti-scientific method wojak meme trying to make a statement about capitalism.
Was it taken over by new management or something?
Okay, but your assertion was that there are not enough homes currently to support our population if they weren’t traded as a commodity. In NYC alone there are over 3.6 Million Housing Units and a population of 8,258,035, with about half of the units being rental and about 1/20 being vacant.
You haven’t provided any evidence that there aren’t enough housing units in the USA.
A decline in housing project expansion is meaningless without context of how many are actually in use.
Do you have the numbers?
For example, Oil and Gas Company Weatherford operates in 75 countries. Al Mansoori also has a wider base of operations. Also, again, if lawyers and journalists are so harmless to the GREAT AND POWERFUL ROYAL OVERLORDS™ then nobody would ever need to be butchered. If a large number of people, say hundreds of affected families, in a class action lawsuit all get butchered at once then even Royalty is going to have a very hard time both domestic and abroad.
It’s pretty clear imo, the seared bones were sealed in the urn full of wine and an additional unworn decorated golden ring. The researchers even talk about reluctance to try it, because while it is perfectly safe judging by the microbiological analysis: it’s had contact with the bones and is quite murky.
The link I sent is to a song that released in 2008, but okay buddy
If it costs a company more to do something than not do it:
Then they won’t do it.
To make a truly genuine argument you would need to use their profit from abuse in warehouses in California, where they were fined.
IDK sounds like communism to me, bro.
Calling you out on whataboutism and watching you get really defensive for some reason. WBU?
Your questions were shit, mate. The important part is that natural gas rockets are a cost cutting measure that is harmful to us all.
Pot Calls the Kettle irrelevant.
lolololol