

Now that I’m more settled, and having re-read your post, it doesn’t seem off base, and indeed seems to be a well-recognized issue, for over a century, at least. I think what triggered my little outburst is recognizing this, while also recognizing I need to find more ways to engage, meeting people where they are. It’s extremely frustrating to bring up, “Jesus said the Kingdom isn’t here or there, but within,” only to have them shirk responsibility to each other to “go to meeting,” or fly to Africa to impose this wildness on others while deposing the Orishas, no less. And my problem with religion or philosophy isn’t the story telling. It’s that the intent of the stories are dismissed on some merit-making ideology. They may have begun as literalism, but the older I get, the more I doubt it, although the purpose has seemingly evolved and devolved by degrees, as human societies evolve and devolve again. The immediate issue seems to me to be first liberating the stories from the money and power hungry, then liberating the stories from morality (primitive religions seem to do it somewhat effectively), then liberating the people from literalism, while also asking how we may evolve our philosophies (stories) to serve the masses. In short, I’m not sure the most direct and efficient route has been the historically most effective and lasting route. And like the destruction of the giant Buddha statues, the temple in Jerusalem, the Dome of the Rock, or the Hanging Gardens, it erases history and any residual knowledge we glean while also sowing deep-seated and centuries-long resentments that flare again and again. This religion or that or none, this clan or that tribe blah blah. And that’s incidentally why I don’t see multiculturalism as a bad idea.






























Eta: and they have historically added some social cohesion, in forms of law, but we’re grown now. Governance needs to serve everyone or no one. So I find myself wondering if perhaps I might give anarchocommunism a more serious look.