Lenin’s point in What Is To Be Done? was that there is no middle ground between revolutionary socialism and liberalism! Any de-emphasis of Marxist theory strengthens bourgeois ideology by default. What makes this dangerous is that the party, functionally, absorbs the energy of dedicated, loyal people who want to be revolutionaries and channels it into work that never actually threatens power, abandoning the necessary and patient work of developing leadership prepared to support the working class in times of crisis.

Resignation letter of a [now-former] member of the PSL

  • 53 Posts
  • 902 Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年10月11日

help-circle

  • Now that I’m more settled, and having re-read your post, it doesn’t seem off base, and indeed seems to be a well-recognized issue, for over a century, at least. I think what triggered my little outburst is recognizing this, while also recognizing I need to find more ways to engage, meeting people where they are. It’s extremely frustrating to bring up, “Jesus said the Kingdom isn’t here or there, but within,” only to have them shirk responsibility to each other to “go to meeting,” or fly to Africa to impose this wildness on others while deposing the Orishas, no less. And my problem with religion or philosophy isn’t the story telling. It’s that the intent of the stories are dismissed on some merit-making ideology. They may have begun as literalism, but the older I get, the more I doubt it, although the purpose has seemingly evolved and devolved by degrees, as human societies evolve and devolve again. The immediate issue seems to me to be first liberating the stories from the money and power hungry, then liberating the stories from morality (primitive religions seem to do it somewhat effectively), then liberating the people from literalism, while also asking how we may evolve our philosophies (stories) to serve the masses. In short, I’m not sure the most direct and efficient route has been the historically most effective and lasting route. And like the destruction of the giant Buddha statues, the temple in Jerusalem, the Dome of the Rock, or the Hanging Gardens, it erases history and any residual knowledge we glean while also sowing deep-seated and centuries-long resentments that flare again and again. This religion or that or none, this clan or that tribe blah blah. And that’s incidentally why I don’t see multiculturalism as a bad idea.



  • No, your ideas are yours, and I’ll have to read and reread a few times, and mull it over. I’m just grappling with our little community aging out, the young being stressed out/disengaged and clinginess to the same ideas and how to engage everyone with clear divisions digging in, while at the same time being closer in ideals (D/R liberalism, evangelism, even if they’re Southern/Baptist, some variation of Pentecostal, Catholic, etc, PoC, white) than to mine, and being really, really itchy to re-engage in 3D.

    Communal/and larger social anomie are one thing, personal anomie another, and it just seems we’re moving fast while braking hard, simultaneously. Like I said, I might have made a freechat post instead. My b.