Sierra [she/her, they/them]

GP gave me the second best option for HRT (without doing DIY), but that probably gives me a bunch of waiting time that I wouldn’t have if she just administered the tests and hormones herself.

Do just a single mini or squad and see how it goes. No need to commit. You can cut down the commitment further by borrowing someone’s paints (or organising a painting session with them).

Going to take my recent trans thoughts to my very queer therapist tomorrow morning. Wish me luck

Isn’t ben getting like… Tiny viewcounts now? Even a hatewatch would be a significant portion of his viewership.

Finally installed linux after all these years. Fresh start!

The hairs are surprisingly deep in there. I saw some of the plucked electrolysis hairs and they were so long compared to how they looked on my face

Second electrolysis today. Some new moustache growth where electrolysis was done previously. I hate having a moustache in preparation for this.

They can’t steal coats and gas masks from us!

Done

I got a bug-a-salt shotgun as flies keep invading my room. Its probably the happiest I’ve been with a purchase immediately on use. At least for a long time (most of my purchases as largely disappointing)

Kinetic penetrator lesbians and Frag lesbians, were we to continue the joke beyond its expiry

This is alongside the Nuclear, Biological, Chemical women?

Sent

This looks like someone wrote a curriculum for “smart guy university” in a super hero movie.

What should I be doing?

Painting shadows and light on your miniature make your details seem more deep than they actually are and allow you to create a narrative around the lighting that you control (as opposed to being at the whims of the room you are in). For instance, my Dark Eldar are “lit” from below by the hot pink disco planet they are on.

The G11 (successful project that it was lol) had square ammo and its performance issues don’t seem to have come from square ammo.

Notes on other people in this thread:

• The casing during firing acts as a seal for the chamber, which can very safely contain the detonation of the round (which is more of a slow burn, no worries of material damaging unpredictable shockwaves).
• Alignment might be an issue, but it would be coming out of a magazine in a predictable manner. There aren’t really mechanical forces imparting spin on the round until it is fired.

Idle thoughts:

• In order to have the same structural integrity, the case would have to be thicker, though not much more so given a round has plenty of strength for supporting itself in a magazine.
• It might reduce friction in a magazine, allowing magazines to be longer. Stacked round bullets impart quite a lot of the magazine spring’s force off into the side of the magazine.
• It might allow a greater volume of the magazine to be propellant, allowing for either a shorter magazine for the same ammo count or a larger magazine.
• It would be more difficult to manufacture. Circles are where its at for manufacturing.
• It would be specialist ammunition for one make of firearm. Not insurmountable, but does make it cost a lot for not much benefit.

I propose hexagonal telescoping casings for double stacking tiny magazines.

RUSSIA! CALIFORNIA!

Like, based on the old dos game?