Why struggling of giving the right to live decently, why we could defend the right to kill each other ?
- 10 Posts
- 409 Comments
menasto
Anime@ani.social•GiTS 2026 censored Israel to the fictional country of GhorantlEnglish
113·12 days ago“True socialist state are slavery one”, people complaining about union and major Kusanagi is eager to make a new unit to kill terrorists. This is the first 10 minutes of the 1st episode. So no surprises that thos dumb right-wing creator protect Israel too.
Whatch Stand Alone Complex
So it’s use-based ownership. Dark magic is marxist
Debian allow killing machine to use it, so it’s not a surprise that thirsty machine are allowed too
I do agree. Maybe I’m little paranoid, but I feel like in some years, recycle old chips will be the only IT available
As far as I know, Lacedemonian society was homophobic and paranoid. This the holy phalanx of Thebes. The one who beat them so hard, that it has ended their reputation of unbeatable warrior.
Definitely unionized, but in a revolutionary union. Those people have a very positive mindset
I work in a self-organized tech coop that we made by ourselves, and I do agree with your. This is a lot of concern to deal with unstable future, and it’s prevent ourselves to be active with others; some people left for stability, and reduce stress.
We are unionize too; and we think about modifying our rules to give the final word to union.
those European are dicks, but so are their bosses
burn thing down seems to have make it append in other industry
That the point : we are choosing
Actually, applying a dogma is not being a good jew/christian/muslim. Theologists justify almost everything in “God let us choose between Good and Evil”. Ironically, their is many learning in the thora/bible/quran that underline the need to not being dogmatic
No, his behavior shall be average, not an exception. However we have to fight the repression that target him, like every other one that stand against repression
Your guys have fixed interest rate for housing ? Here their is only composed one. We used tu pay 50k of interest for a 20 year loan
Actually, this propaganda from the french wine industry. In France, this lobby have disrupted several campaign of prevention, and spread this fake
menasto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What are your thoughts on people who are against pacifism?
4·4 months agopacifism <> anti-militarist <> non-violence
However depending on how you define those, you may recognize in each one. If we rely on a legal definition, militarism and war are only link to states. Armed force without state are not an army, and armed conflicts no declared by states are not war. Dumb lex, sed lex
For exemple, in this definition revolution is not a war, so pacifist could took part in armed force independent from states. That explain why their is a pacifist tradition in communism … except when those revolution succeed … well you should leave that armed force that became an army and refuse conscription.
This debate occurred recently through the essay “How Nonviolence Protects the State”, which address the non-violence and/or pacifism as exploiters : if you don’t want to use violence, other will have to The essay do not get rid of the ideal of non-violence, only what individual position do to people that could not choose.
Now their is an Elephant in the room : police. A violent armed force, acting for a state but without a declaration of war. So from our first definition, we could be a pacifist and let the cops do the exact same thing that an army.
Non-aligned movement are composed by States. Their is a lot of proletarian or people movement which are (by definition) not States. Of course their seems to be a minority, as well as western countries seems to be democratic. Such impression are made by the same system (the bourgeoisie) and are disproved when we do some research.



















I think it’s pretty normal