• 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is more for a show I guess, which is not to say they shouldn’t do it.

    Surely first step in invasion over the bridge would be to just hit that bridge with some rocket…?

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it can be for two things at once. Definetly more for show, but increases annoyance/makes a possible invasion more annoying.

        Obviously I imagine they have a way to blow up the bridge too which sounds far more effective.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      100% for sending a message.

      That bridge is pre-sighted for artillery or has its own dedicated missile just waiting for someone to hit the proverbial button.

      If it’s not, then that’s just bad planning.

      The real question is “do they wait for someone to try crossing before blowing it up, or just do it the moment Russian forces twitch in that direction?”

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        if sappers can get to that bridge, then it can be just mined and if needed removed at milisecond notice. much more reliable, faster and more efficient than artillery