• IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure the term Web 3.0 was created by cryptobros to promote their stuff

    I don’t think Lemmy counts because you are still using the head server instead of being self-hosted

    • gon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh ok, Web3 seems to be pretty hazy and loosely defined so I’m inclined to believe you’re right about it being just a buzzword basically.

      • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Show me where is my self hosting setup with the dedicated IP and a server rack running then lol

        You’re just using someone else’s server, just like you did in Web 1.0, it’s not self-hosted at all

        • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m hosting and using my own instance personally, but the important part is that it’s decentralized and federated. Think of it like email - businesses often have their own email servers they use to communicate with yours, unlike on Facebook or Reddit where all of it happens on their servers.

          • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly, there’s a difference between self-hosted networks like meshes and mostly privately hosted. It’s like calling all email self-hosted, even though less than 1% of users self-host.

            • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              As far as I know, they never claimed Lemmy was entirely self-hosted. Their intention was likely to say it can be, in which case decentralized would’ve been more clear…

              • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The original commenter said that “Lemmy is self-hosted”. This is what this comment thread was about. It sure is decentralized, not really self-hosted, even though you can host it youself.

                Edit: read another comment wrong

                • aranym@lemmy.nameOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m aware of the original comment. I also agree that Lemmy can’t be referred to as self hosted in the same way that Plex can, for example. I simply think they meant to say “can be” self hosted instead of “is”.

                  • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Just look at their comments. They full on say it’s a self-hosted platform no matter what, even though most people don’t host it and all of them don’t have to host it.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can host your own instance, it’s not that hard. Just because you can share someone else’s self hosted instance or a larger one doesn’t make it magically different. Learn how the fediverse works.