I don’t understand why there are so many people who consider themselves “Marxist feminists”, but at the same time are distracted by astrology.

The origin of feminism is working class, and as a working class movement, it is materialist. I don’t know if they at least know what dialectical materialism is, since they don’t see such an abysmal contradiction between astrology (pseudoscience) and feminism (materialism).

They remind me of the liberal “feminist” Gloria Steinem.

And the same with some anarchists.

What do you think about it?

    • qocu [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sorry, but I never assumed it was women who considered themselves Marxist feminists in the first instance, I wrote “people”. And I’m not taking astrology as “a hobby I do in my spare time”, I’m referring specifically to the anti-materialism implicit in it, taken worryingly seriously by supposedly materialist people.

      • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This is very silly. Not everything needs to fit into a “materialst/anti-materialist” box.

        What about reading works of fiction? Playing card games? Watching movies? Studying languages? Learning a skill? None of these have anything to do with materialism or production. Are the people engaging in them, “anti-materialist”? Are the activities “anti-materialist”?

        There’s absolutely nothing wrong with astrology, its a fun hobby like anything else.

        • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s nothing anti-materialist in fiction because it doesn’t claim predictive capabilities on reality, there are anti-materialist things in astrology because it claims predictive capabilities on reality.