MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agoMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayimagemessage-square160fedilinkarrow-up1911arrow-down117
arrow-up1894arrow-down1imageMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square160fedilink
minus-squareEtterra@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·23 hours agoHey, if it works it works.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·21 hours agoIt works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·18 hours agoIt works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
minus-squareFridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·14 hours agoWell, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·17 hours agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 hours agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
Hey, if it works it works.
It works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
It works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
Well, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.