• SpaceDogs@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    They make villains who’s goals make total sense and are something to root for, so to balance that they make the villains kill innocents just to make sure the audience doesn’t accidentally side with them.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Poison Ivy’s explicitly stated goals are mass genocide, how is that something to root for. She’s not advocating for moving to solar or nuclear and reducing emissions.

      • RedCat@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s the point. You have a Villain who wants something good (stop the destruction of nature) and then pair it with something very evil (genocide). It’s a very common trope in media. It leads to the “Hero” of the story being able to defend the status quo again and again without ever challenging it.

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I understand, but the villain doesn’t lead with “Let’s stop the destruction of nature”, they lead with “Everyone should die”.

          I don’t think Poison Ivy ever actually makes a compelling argument for conservationism and anti-capitalism. They just really REALLY hate people.

          • RedCat@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            That might be the case. You seem to know more about Batman than I do so I will do as Mao suggests and shut up before I haven’t researched the topic.

            Any Batman comics you could recommend?

            • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              That is a can of worms about on par with a leftist asking “In what order should I read theory”? There a 1001 correct answers, and there is no exact timeline about how you can delve into the character.

              I have a decent bit of superhero knowledge and I dive into it every now and then, but I will not claim that I am some absolute authority on this subject and that I can give you a definitive list.

              I will however recommend “Batman: Year One” as it is a good place to start with the character and that is considered one of the best comics of all time.

              For a Batman/Joker story I would recommend the “Killing Joke” series, but I will say that is is fairly mature in its content, as it really attempts to delve into the Joker’s psychology as a tragic but evil character.

              The Batman stories in the “Flashpoint” Series is fun as a side story as it follows a world where the Flash makes one change and alters all of history, and Batman ends up being Thomas Wayne (the dad) rather then Bruce Wayne (the son), and this is a much more aggressive and violent Batman, with a pretty shady moral code as Thomas goes full capitalist and is pretty evil.

              The Long Halloween is also pretty good!

              • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Not begrudging your interests, but I think this post kind of summarizes why I have never been able to read any western comics.

                I like really concrete beginning/end points for fictional media. I like to be able to say “This is book 1, I can start here. This is book 4, it’s the last one”. I also hate jumping into any series in the middle, even if it is absolutely designed for it. Anytime I have thought about trying to read any western comics (or warhammer on the same note) it just seems like a massive ambigious undertaking.

  • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I didn’t watch Black Panther but wasn’t that a similar thing where the “bad guy” is right but like he kills innocents to cement himself as the bad guy of the film?

    • In the world of Black Panther, Killmonger’s plan to arm African descendants across the globe represents the beginning stages of the Pan-African ideal, where Blacks all over the world fight for liberation by any means necessary.

      He’s a villain, he murdered at least one unarmed person in cold blood and his plan was to use advanced technology to wage a bloody and violent uprising. It was to take control through power and death.

      Also I think T’Challa (the protaganist) was a fed or had a deal with the US

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Also I think T’Challa (the protaganist) was a fed or had a deal with the US

        He was literally the diamond warlord living in glass tower full of hi tech while his subjects waded around mud streets, he also supported tribalism and superstition which divided his people so he could rule them, and let’s not forget the endangered species animal abuse and weaponisation. Somehow exactly like some of the US comics villains from 60’s, but spinned at sympthetic.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Colossus from X-Men. While he is consistently written as one of the best and nicest superheroes in entire universe, he also have gusano moments and is indirectly a vector for all imaginable gusano propaganda against USSR. Or Black Widow who is straight up a gusano and needed an children atrocity story at her origin to make her even slightly sympathetic.