• Laereht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s funny that one instance of child rape apologia creates so much more in these comments. There are some real debate lords(/trolls) out here making arguments that would be immediately tossed if faced with a child victim in real life.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      We also shouldn’t have to rely on these cases to protect a woman’s inherent right to her body.

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        An Unborn child isn’t “her body” (Let’s see how you spin this as a “Rape Apology”)

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Nothing to spin. It isn’t a child. It’s a fetus. That’s the whole crux of the debate. You think it’s a person, many of us do not. If this argument was the slam dunk you think it is then the entire debate wouldn’t exist.

          Are you so arrogant as to think you’ve solved arguably the most challenging and controversial ethics question of the modern era?

        • Dupree878@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s using her body so she has every right to remove it in the same way it’s legal to shoot someone who’s on top raping her.

          It’s not her body. It’s a parasite