I’d like to thank everyone for my most upvoted post on lemmy ever. Not only have you upvoted it to the top for like 2 days you commented the shit out of it. I’d like to take this opportunity to say fuck the mods of this instance. This was my second post coming off a 30 day ban and I want to say these fucking mods have been nothing but bitches. I’ve never been more attacked on any other instance, subreddit, forum, etc. then I have been in this fucking instance. Not only have I been attacked I’ve been told my memes arent memey enough again and again.

I’ll be honest, I do not know how to make a meme but I keep posting just to piss in these mods cheerios.

Thanks lemmy.world/politicalmemes for being the worst community I’ve ever been a part of.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    ah, so you don’t know how policy works.

    protests very frequently change policy. protests are why you have 8-hour days and firefighters.

    these ones are making a change as well.

    • Saljid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That wasn’t just protests. Unionists and syndicalists paid for that dearly in blood.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            you are historically and factually incorrect.

            as for your backwards insult, I am advocating for change through protest, which Is historically relevant in changing policy, while you are whining that nobody should “get rowdy”.

            you are hiding, you have been cowed into believing you can’t make a change.

            stand up. have some pride.

            • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              which Is historically relevant in changing policy

              When?

              while you are whining that nobody should “get rowdy”.

              That’s the exact opposite of what I’m saying.

              you are hiding, you have been cowed into believing you can’t make a change.

              Again, that’s the opposite of what I’m saying. We can make a change, but protests aren’t how it gets done.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                “When?”

                Gandhi freed India(1947

                The Civil Right Act.(1964)

                Women’s Suffrage(1920)

                nearly every labor right you enjoy(from 200 years ago up to today)

                nearly every civil right you enjoy.(sames)

                There are literally countless examples.

                All of your privileges you take for granted and are blissfully ignorant of were bestowed upon you by caring citizens who took the time to demonstrate their political will.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    again, this 100% agrees with my thesis that protests are effective, your pretense of argument is nonsensical.

                    thank you for proving me right again, and if you want to pretend that proving me correct somehow benefits you, go for it.

                • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  This is exactly what I mean. You are gaslit into thinking those were accomplished through protests and not violent riots.

                  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    To be fair the liberation of India wasn’t accomplished through violence, at least not mainly. It wasn’t accomplished through protest either, mind you; Ghandi’s approach was simply not supporting the British occupation (which needed Indian collaboration to function) and letting it collapse under its own weight.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    those wins were accomplished through protests, and this sounds like it’s going to shock you, but a violent mob is a form of protest.

                    You’re still agreeing with me, despite your efforts.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          yes, a strike is a subset of protest, but the person you were responding to said “standing in a street? nobody cares” because they are accurately saying that the current protests are not labor strikes

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            not at all.

            they were inaccurately saying that protests do not affect policy.

            that is flatly incorrect.

            protests do affect policy, regardless of the form of protest.

            they did not say “the current protests are not labor strikes”, which would be a bizarre non-sequitur.

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              they said that “standing in a street? no one cares.” can you dospute that? is standing in a street what got us 8 hour days, or was it the labor strikes?

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                “they said that “standing in a street? no one cares.” can you dospute that?”

                Yes, easily. I can prove them and you irrefutably incorrect.

                The civil rights movement happened because people were “standing in a street”

                women got the right to vote because people were “standing in a street”

                racial inequalities in labor were legislatively addressed because people were “standing in a street”

                remember that " I have a dream" speech?

                Guess where Martin Luther King Jr was standing?

                y’all ig’nant.

        • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Y’know I think we’re arguing pointlessly here. Put that energy and anger you have into getting people onto the street, enough people (100s of thousands) does have impact, but just maybe try taking on board what everyone is trying to say which is that you need more than protests, you absolutely need strikes, and possibly more.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            You don’t need as many people as you’re afraid of, but don’t worry, I am getting people out there.

            “…everyone is trying to say which is that you need more than protests, you absolutely need strikes.”

            This is my original point that “everybody” is angrily agreeing with me about, so…sure.

            I still agree with my original point.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Inertia is a human force of behavior, I get that. But the landscape has changed. The methods of pre-2024 will NOT work, they will be summarily ignored. Standing in a street will now be summarily ignored.

      Or forcefully dispersed. Remember, in his prior admin, he wanted to know why we didn’t just send the national guard out to kneecap people.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Inertia is a human force of behavior, I get that.”

        great.

        “But the landscape has changed.”

        boy, has it not.

        “The methods of pre-2024 will NOT work, they will be summarily ignored.”

        this is incorrect, and is much more a symptom of anxiety than any sort of legitimate statement.

        “Standing in a street will now be summarily ignored.”

        again, incorrect and a simple anxiety.

        I’m sure things look very scary or daunting to you, but you don’t have to take part in making the US a better place, these tens of thousands of people are doing that for you.

        “Or forcefully dispersed.”

        this one’s definitely not happening.

        there were 50 protests a few days ago that were not dispersed, and countless others defending civil rights Nationwide in the past week that were not “dispersed”.

        you have the wrong information, or more likely, no information.

        again, it sounds like anxiety.