• PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all about human advancement, but nothing about cars is required. If it were trains, sure I’m with you.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Train networks good enough for people to travel wherever they want are difficult on the scale of large countries like Canada, the US, and Russia.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Incorrect. The US was built on passenger rail travel. It just wasn’t as profitable as freight and also once cars started becoming a thing then car interest groups started fucking things up to make more money.

      • markr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We had a world class transcontinental rail system that was stunningly expansive. Much of it, especially the branch lines that went just about everywhere people built towns and cities, has been abandoned, sold, or converted to bike paths. Now we have basically a freight only system with near zero branch service, and some local and inter-city rail transit that is utterly shitty by developed world standards.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Nothing about cars is required”

      ho boy you’ve obviously never lived anywhere super rural. When the nearest house is 15 miles away, you need some form of transportation better than a bike.

      This is a very “never lived anywhere but the city” take

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I guess rural living didn’t exist between 1900 and the beginning of human civilization did it? Because this is a very “ignorant of history and can’t imagine an alternative” take, which doesn’t reflect well upon you.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol and things took exponentially longer and had a massive time investment to go anywhere.

          Don’t get me wrong I’m not big on car centric design, but pretending personal transportation isn’t and hasn’t been important is just ignoring the practicality of the world.