• piratekaiser@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Look at history. You need a tipping point, but more importantly, you need organised masses and a vision/visionary to get behind.

    That’s how Lenin got in power. It’s how the French decapitated their king. That’s why there was a rally at the White house when trump lost the previous election but nobody is doing anything against him now at the states while he dismantles the country.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Correct, but there is a lot of nuance.

      Indeed, when things get bad, the public is willing to take risks. When everything is good enough, they don’t revolt.

      However, successful revolts do require intelligent and capable leaders.

      What the rich have realized, is that if they ensure smart and skilled kids get picked out of the drudgery and get comfortable working for the rich, then the exploited class will not really have anyone to lead them.

      Put another way, in 1908, every factory had a few leaders working at the lowest levels. And they are the ones who spearheaded strikes and such.

      Nowadays, society is really stratified in terms of skill.

      Anyone who grew up poor, but had talent to organize, probably ended up in some kind of middle management or professional job and makes 2x the average.

      Convincing these people to have class solidarity is difficult. Only a few of them actually see the bigger. Those tend to become middle or upper management or politicians, making 3-5x the average workers salary. And of those, only a very select few are willing to fight for the common man.

      So yeah, the rich engineered a system that they can control. To actually change anything is going to be very difficult.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Iran, 1977, mass demonstrations that were often kicked off by communists and socialists leading to a revolution in 1979.

        Iran, 1988, communists, many who were involved in the revolution, begin being executed by the Islamic government.

        Revolution is also sadly no guarantee of anything getting better.

        “The moral arc of history bends towards justice” is a lie Westerners have sold themselves for far too long while the evidence otherwise has stared them in the face if they were paying any attention at all.

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Well yes, it turns out billions of us aid and explicit US training can stamp out communism, at least without any other support structures.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        in 1908, every factory had a few leaders working at the lowest levels. And they are the ones who spearheaded strikes and such.

        (I can’t be the first person to have this thought so someone please chime in and tell me where to learn more.)

        The scale of housing and factories was different in 1908 though. These days factories are giant complexes in the middle of nowhere with supercommuters that don’t live anywhere near each other or the factory so don’t have the same opportunities to fraternize and organize in their homes and taverns. I don’t know how workers can overcome this massive hurdle from the modern era.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Wow you really picked two of the worst possible examples. French Revolutionaries decapitated so many officials that they ended up decapitating the previous wave of French Revolutionaries, then Napoleon and the Church took over.