• Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Mechanical door locks can be picked, but it must be done at the lock in plain view rather than at a distance sitting in a car while you do the majority of the work and then casually walking up and opening the door. Locks are more of an inconvenience than a deterrent, so it should be made as inconvenient as possible. Connecting them to the internet is the exact opposite of that.

    • variants_of_concern@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      But more realistically someone robbing your house is going to ring your doorbell to see if someone is home, then just walk around checking for unlocked windows.

      • Bonehead@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        True, but again it’s about making it as inconvenient as possible. Manually locking windows and making sure they are locked is effective. In some places they put security bars on the windows. Tall fences can also create obstacles as well.

        You won’t stop everyone that wants to break in, but you can create enough trouble to keep out most people. Making it convenient for yourself by connecting everything to the internet just makes it convenient for everyone else too.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          You can’t ever stop someone who really wants to get into your home. The best you can do is make your home look too tedious to bother with.

          Or make your neighbor’s home more attractive. Try keeping the neighbor’s house key, neatly labelled & with alarm code, under your own doormat. Just in case.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bear theory.

        My house doesn’t need to be impenetrable, it just needs to be more of a hassle to get into than yours.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not even that. It just needs to look like more of a hassle.

          They really just let anyone buy those signs that say you have security cameras or an angry dog.

          • variants_of_concern@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Someone mentioned to me that those angry dog signs are a liability because if someone gets bit they can say you knew you had angry dog, so it’s best just to have a sign that says dog and doesn’t mention it’s mood

            • FireTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Might dependsl on your jurisdiction. But I wouldn’t be worried they’d probably need to prove you had a duty of care to them which you acted outside of which resulted in injuries that could have been avoided by you acting with a reasonable level of care.

              Also if you did have a duty of care to them and knowingly had a dangerous dog not warning someone of known dangers (the dog) might constitute a break of your duty of care.

              Tldr: It depends, you get what you pay for get your advice from actual local lawyers not random people on the street or the internet (like me).

    • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think CGP Grey has a video about this concept. It’s not so much that a mechanic lock is better or more secure.

      It’s more that it takes one person $x seconds to break into one lock.

      That’s very different than allowing a million people the opportunity to break your digital lock millions of times.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a different threat model.

        An average house lock is pretty easy to pick. An average picker of locks could get through in minutes. Someone who trained for years could get through in a few seconds if they’re lucky. Someone using a pick gun, willing to risk damaging the lock, can often get through in seconds. But, each individual lock is different, so you never know how long it will take to get through. Taking any more than 10 seconds to get through a door looks suspicious, so it’s very risky to try to pick a lock if you’re not willing to take a chance at looking suspicious, even if you’re a master lock picker.

        With electronic locks, if there’s an exploit for that lock and the person going up to the lock has access to it, they could get through instantly and not look at all suspicious. If there’s no exploit, the person is out of luck. The person trying to break in also doesn’t have to have any expertise. They just need access to the exploits. Also, because people are constantly trying to find exploits, there’s almost guaranteed to be a time when your lock is vulnerable. Making it worse, with an electronic lock, someone can inspect the lock one time, and then just wait for a vulnerability for that particular lock to be available.

    • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And my smart lock alerts me when someone unlocks it. Sure it could be hacked, but it is more likely that someone will just kick the door open.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Picking locks takes skill, kicking down a door is higher risk of alerting someone or getting caught. Those both deter a lot of would-be criminals.

        Whereas a hack creates a situation where criminals are going to target those devices – it’s “low risk”. Any opportunistic asshole with 2 brain cells can download the hack and go around trying doors until it works.