• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What profit-driven industry doesn’t do the same?

    This is a capitalism “profits first, last and always” problem, not specifically a railroad problem.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many industries have discovered the costs of not doing safety first are higher in the long run. You have to pay more workers comp insurance, you have to train replacement workers for those who are injured, you have to scrap/replace parts destroyed, and when someone is injured it affects moral and so your people don’t work well.

      Railroads are throwing money away by not putting safety first - they just don’t realize it.

      • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Railroads are in the advantageous position they can get governments to coverup and pay for their failures.

        The government should hold the management who block required work as criminally negligent.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jesus Christ, I knew this was going to be bad, but holy shit. There’s some real zingers in there.

    On the busy rail corridor running through northwest Atlanta, there was a notorious stretch of track known for tripping up engineers. Larry Coston didn’t feel like he could navigate the large number of signal lights safely going the speed limit of 60 mph, so he radioed the dispatcher that he’d be driving at a slower speed, a 6 to 8 mph crawl, in an effort to avoid an accident.

    Norfolk Southern fired him for “intentionally” delaying his assignment. The company declined to comment on specific cases. But his boss, and his boss’ boss, testified in his ongoing lawsuit that his judgment didn’t matter; engineers should travel at maximum authorized speeds regardless of their safety concerns. “Run your train,” his direct supervisor, Travis Bailey, a senior road manager of engines, said in a deposition. “Do your job.”

    Supervisors have strong incentives to push their workers like this. Court records show that several freight rail companies rate and rank their managers using metrics that reward them for trains staying on schedule and penalize them for disruptions — even when the delays are caused by safety precautions. “Slow order delays,” for example, calculate the amount of time lost from slowing trains because of unsafe track conditions.

    That’s just one among the most egregious examples. They track downtime due to safety issues and penalize managers for delays due to things being unsafe rather than just fucking fixing it. I’ve worked for some really shitty employers over the years, and the only ones who ever tried to skirt safety issues due to costs were the places that were being run as vulture capital operations. I’m becoming increasingly convinced that the plan is to eventually declare insolvency because the costs to fix their bullshit is going to be too much, and have the government buy them out and remake CONRAIL. Once the government fixes their infrastructure on the taxpayer dime, they’re going to start lobbying Congress to re-privatize CONRAIL for pennies on the dollar because of “free market efficiency”.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Automated signaling exists and can manage all sections at the maximum safe speed. Trains shouldn’t even have anyone inside to drive normally. The job is obsolete today. (drivers might be useful in yards, or little used branches, but not the main line - in both cases the driver should live near their section and work when there is a train then go home)

      Of course automatic signaling is programmed to be safe. Thus if that section cannot be driven faster than 10mph (or whatever speed) there is no override to go faster anyway.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not 100% sure about that. Can you give me a little context as to where your knowledge comes from? Railroaders I’ve seen discussing fully automated trains seemed to have some doubts about the viability of the technology.

        • bluGill@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many passenger trains around the world run fully automated.

          the big issue is without someone on board there is nobody to see someone on the tracks and hit the emergency brake. My counter to that is it doesn’t matter as the train won’t stop until long after whoever was on the track is hit and dead.

  • nl4real@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blood-boiling. Maybe a few of these managers should take a tree to the face and see how concerned with efficiency they are afterwards.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can we please stop with that? He did do the right thing with the railway workers. The strike would likely have had a massive economic impact across the nation and in many different industries. Avoiding the strike while still getting the workers much of what they wanted was a very good result. Not perfect, but we can’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

      The rail union is quite pleased with how things played out according to IBEW’s Railway Department Director Al Russo.

      https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

      “We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers.

      “We know that many of our members weren’t happy with our original agreement,” Russo said, “but through it all, we had faith that our friends in the White House and Congress would keep up the pressure on our railroad employers to get us the sick day benefits we deserve. Until we negotiated these new individual agreements with these carriers, an IBEW member who called out sick was not compensated.”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can we please stop defending Biden every time he hurts us?

        Sick days weren’t literally the only thing they wanted to strike for - there were numerous safety concerns, concerns about overtime, concerns about scheduling, and more:

        Of particular note:

        The Association of American Railroads, which represents freight railway operators, said its members have been hiring in recent years to address staffing needs and recognize employees’ desire for better scheduling. The group said the number of overtime hours worked by BMWE union members increased to 4.7 hours per week in 2022, compared to 4 hours in 2016.

        Cory Ludwig, who works as a machine operator repairing railway tracks in Iowa, said he’s been working Saturdays and some Sundays along with 10- to 12-hour shifts since September. Recently, he worked 13 days without a day off. With the mandatory Saturday work, he’s had to rely on friends and relatives to take care of his five-year-old and nine-year-old kids. He said the overtime demands have increased as he’s seen the number of workers assigned to his crew go down.

        “You fall asleep and then you wake up in the morning and you go right back to work. It can really break a person down, it gets really wearing on a person after a while,” Ludwig said. “With less people trying to do the same amount of work, working long hours, working multiple weeks in a row without one day off, you get irritated and you get burnt out.”

        Recently one of the union’s members had been working 22 hours straight when he fell asleep on the job, an error that could have put his colleagues’ lives at risk but also could have been avoided had the employee had a rest period, said Ballew. Another member was recently disciplined for refusing to work through his scheduled days off on short notice so he could care for a family member having health issues, Ballew said.

        “The stress it puts on marriages and parenting and the things you leave behind for your spouse to deal with or the things you miss, that kind of stress builds up,” said Ballew. “In the rail industry, we have noticed recently a spat of suicides and I can’t help but think there is a correlation there.”

        Lives are still being ruined.

        Stop your strike breaker apologetics.

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can we please stop defending Biden every time he hurts us?

          I honestly pray Biden voters never have human relationships that resemble their parasocial-electoral ones with Biden, it’s terrifyingly similar to abusive relationships.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re confusing the minority of fanatics with a majority of reluctant supporters. There aren’t 80 million rabid fanatics foaming at the mouth to support Biden.

            • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Reluctantly choosing to stay with someone you know is hurting you because you feel like you have no choice isn’t exactly a healthy relationship either. If you’re in other ones like that please run.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The two viable choices in 2020 were Biden or Trump. The two viable choices in 2024 are going to be Biden or Trump.

                Are you suggesting we vote for Trump over Biden?

              • Zorque@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Get in line or get out of my country” essentially? The more abusive relationship would be to let Trump (or one of his compatriots) in out of principle because you refuse to vote for the lesser evil. We don’t have the luxury of just choosing who is best and getting a great deal out of the situation. We’re stuck between a bog of eternal stench and a rampaging horde of zombies. Neither is great, but I’ll take the stench over the zombies if it means I get to live a little longer, and maybe make my situation better in the long run.

                I know some people would prefer to just stand their ground and face the zombies so they don’t actually have to make tough decisions. But that’s not me.

                • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you keep voting for evil candidates you will keep gettig evil choices. If all they have to do for your vote is be slightly less evil than the other one, that’s all you’ll ever get. I find that unacceptable, so I use that to inform my actions.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that one small segment of one small section of workers, not all rail workers? Weren’t their demands only a tiny fraction of what the overall strikers wanted?

        Isn’t “but the economy” just another tired excuse to not implement any lasting change because it might affect votes, not the wellbeing of the American people?

        Change is hard, and especially when you put it off for so long, it can hurt. But in the long run you come out better for it. Putting it off means it’s just going to hurt worse later, if we even get a chance to do it. Workers are still over-worked and understaffed. Biden swooping in to “save the day” by telling them “Yeah, sure, we’ll help you when it’s convenient for us” didn’t change that. No matter what an electricians union rep might have to say about it.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can we please stop posting an electrical unions opinion? They always had sick days, they supported Bidens no sick day deal before the planned strike.

        Rail unions still dont all have sick days, the ones that do have fewer than they would have, and their future bargaining power is poisoned.