I heard this marketing is all studio push because they didn’t think people would want to watch a movie about peasants rising up against the wealthy.
Did people who did see it like it?
Yea none of this means its actually bad movie. Might be worth looking into, who cares if it was poorly marketed as a robin hood film.
All I heard about it was Andrew Garfield promoting it, saying it’s important for people to see and will hopefully inspire people who are feeling hopelessness in today’s world.
If it’s truly a film about a population “rising up” against their oligarch oppressors, I’m not shocked it was poorly advertised. The quicker it flops at the box office, the quicker Hollywood can bury it. Don’t want to give a struggling population dealing with similar circumstances any ideas…
I don’t think it’s this sinister. I just think most folks who watch a film like this also see the paradox of how Hollywood films like this are essentially sugar pills. They may make people feel good in the moment, but they aren’t going to cause anyone to grab a pitchfork and head downtown either.
Something with this much of a budget a theatrical release totally has Hollywood money behind it. Its not like a purposefully orchestrated tax write off flop either, those are bigger budgets (Madam Webb = tax write off plus tactic to keep Spidey IP)
Someone may want to bury the film with lack of advertising though. Or, yeah, its just a bad movie they dont want to throw money at propping it. I’ll try to see it in the next few weeks to decide myself.
…“Hollywood” is just a bunch of investors who want their percentage back and dont give a fuck about what message the film has.
Is this the film that tried to paint Robin Hood as bad? If so then good.jpg
I thought that was The Death of Robin Hood. It’s about an aging Robin Hood who is tormented by his life of killing and robbing people and looking for forgiveness before he dies.
I thought that was a great movie, but it was marketed all wrong. I hope more people watch it. Jackman was fantastic.
Robin Hood has always been seen as a common-class hero, so a film where he regrets all the deeds he’s performed (and supposedly all the people he murdered along the way) is re-writing the hero as a villain looking for redemption for his evil deeds.
Meanwhile, a new version of A Christmas Carol is releasing this year, simply titled Ebenezer, which is once again promoting the humanization and redemption of the wealthiest man in town.
Ebenezer, which is once again promoting the humanization and redemption of the wealthiest man in town.
Eeeeeeewwwww no thanks.
Tragic story of bad marketing…
Literally the first I heard of the movie
Can’t load the site because they don’t respect privacy.
So… it’s not a Robin Hood story?
Never was
I was hoping this film could be Piers Plowman
Btw, Robinhood is a decent book to read to your kids.
I have seen the trailer for this twice, and I swear they changed the name of the movie from Plowman to The Uprising.
The Robin Hood myth is so ancient it’s tied to demigods. There were Robins hooding after William th Conquer changed cow to beef. It’s a British archetype given name, right down to the bowmanship.
tl;dr - Robin Hood is an anthropomorphic personification.
Robin Hood is an anthropomorphic personification
I agree.
