Well, yes and no. It’s good to order new food! But if you gave it a fair chance and still don’t like it then you shouldn’t force it down your throat

Unfortunately i think we’re at a point where even a dinosaur-killing level asteroid wouldn’t fully wipe us out. Like there are people in Cheyenne mountain 24/7 which iirc is designed to withstand a direct nuke hit and has supplies to last for years, including food, energy, and oxygen. And after that life would be a massive struggle, but if any life survived after that then we would probably survive too

I only know a tiny bit about trees, but i think the answer is basically never. Only the very outer layer of a tree grows, so the parts that were constricted during that year’s growth will stay permanently that shape forever.

Cosmetically I’d guess the bark might grow in to fill the gap, but that’s just a pure guess

A biological scan to determine if a person has adhd or autism would be fantastic. Currently the diagnoses are based on subjective questionings that are very open to interpretation and often vary widely by the individual who’s administering the testing. I’ve heard horror stories of people having to fight to get a diagnosis even though it’s obvious that they have the condition.

Ah i got them mixed up, good catch. Still he had the entire calendar named after him.

In fact the entire calendar is (edit: was) named after him

Nonsense, that’s like saying if you commit crimes in gta then you’ll commit crimes in real life

How is that related to what i said in my comment?

It’s a smart move by sony. Apple, google, and meta all spent zillions of dollars on vr/ar development, and yet all of them didn’t get significant consumer uptake, and all of them don’t see profit even on a remotely envisionable horizon. So it seems very smart to get out of that market, especially now while you can still get back a lot of money from selling your patents

That is very clearly a NOT reputable source. A reputable source on a scientific topic will almost NEVER be a site that’s entirely about a single highly specific topic and be painting it all negatively or all positively.

Holy fuck yes!

Look at her picture, based on her apparent age i doubt that’s correct

EDIT

Yeah i looked her up on Wikipedia, and while it doesn’t say her age explicitly, the pic there makes it clear that she didn’t use the internet when she was a kid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Inman_Grant

Yeah i don’t understand what op is talking about

It’s not banana slices, when she presses it down they maintain their curved shape and it makes a crunching noise

iirc they still were flying in the 80s

Wait what? You don’t even have a septic tank? It all just pours right into the ground?!

Close but not quite, it stands for strategic reconnaissance. It’s not stealth. Stealth technology didn’t come into existence until the late 80s early 90s

If a story has prominent fictional science, then it’s science fiction. FTL travel, freezing people in carbonite and reviving them, midichlorians, etc etc etc, - Star Wars is definitely science fiction.

Ironic typo?

It’s odd to me that OP assumed people would prefer that drab boringness. If people liked it then the producers would’ve kept using that aesthetic