• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Good point, he didn’t.

    Biden used it to structure the new ‘migrant bill’ he’s going to sign.

    On the topic of Muslims though, he’s also actively facilitating a genocide of a majority Muslim nation, even circumventing Congress to do so.

    If your litmus test for what candidate to support is ‘which one might be the least terrible’, and that test leads you to actively support the one running guns and giving diplomatic cover to a nation engaging in ethnic cleansing, I think you need to re-evaluate things. And you are actively supporting him because you’re in here defending him. The president who is enabling mass murder.

    “Oh but Trump would do it too” that isn’t a defense for why Biden is doing it.

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Moving goal post. One is dealing with a massive influx of migrants the other was used for “terriost”.

      Do we need to redo our immigration process? Absolutely, speaking from experience. Can we allow uncontrolled numbers from coming into the us? No. Is biden doing the best thing for the southern border. I’m not sure, experts seems to say no.

        • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Only took 2 contentious replies for them to go from ‘religious ban bad’ to ‘uncontrolled immigrants are a problem’.

          And they claim to be a succdem lmao, they’re not even that, they’re an embarrassed conservative. Even most liberals don’t like this policy, it’s why ‘most experts’ by their own admission are against it. r/politics buries most articles on it.

          This idiot is just an out and about racist.