In an interview with Fox News Sunday, J.D. Vance that “it is possible” that the United States will take over Greenland.

At the same time, Donald Trump’s vice president is lashing out at Denmark.

“There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about Greenland. This is really important for our national security.”

“There are seaways that the Chinese and Russians use, and frankly, Denmark, which controls Greenland, does not do its job. It’s not a good ally," J.D. Vance for Fox News.

“So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to take more territorial interests in Greenland, that’s what President Trump will do, because he doesn’t care what the Europeans are crying out to us. He cares to put the interests of the American people first," J.D. continues. Vance.

The vice president of the United States also highlights another point that “people are not aware of.”

“There are probably 55,000 people living in Greenland who are not actually happy with the Danish government,” J.D. Vance.

“They have great natural resources there, they have an incredibly rich country that the Danes don’t let them develop and explore.”

“Donald Trump, of course, would have a different approach if he was Greenland’s leader,” the vice president said.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We’re either going to see the EU/NATO lay flat while USA takes territory, or we’re going to see USA annex and invade EU territory and be met with war.

      Probably the former, but it won’t be good.

      Vance is also intentionally ignoring the fact that 85% of Greenlanders were negative to Americans seizing their country. He throws out the unhappy 55,000 Greenlanders speculation as if they haven’t already been asked about the situation directly. He does not care what the Greenlanders think, he just wants to seize Greenland.

      • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s the same rhetoric that Russia has used to annex land. “They aren’t happy, the people voted and supported us” and “they have always been Russian, the land was Russia’s historically. We are just taking our land back”

      • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Honestly I hope we’ll see neither of those scenarios but in the hypothetical event of a US invasion, the EU project would fall apart if it wasn’t met with a direct answer.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He keeps saying that USA has an interest in it because they have an interest in it.

    There’s no reasoning except for daddy Trump saying he wants it.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The resources have not been mined because it’s not financially feasible, yet.

        China who are otherwise masters of long term planning discarded the idea about 15 years ago. They wanted to invest in Greenland by building airports and make a transport hub on Greenland for both cargo and passengers in exchange for mining permissions. They backed out because it’s simply not a good business.

        Despite the ice melting, it’s going to take a long time for it to be worth the effort. Perhaps 30-50 years or so, assuming they’re still worth anything in the future and if transport can be done cheaply by boats. Donald Trump would be long gone by then anyway.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 hours ago

    O no the 55k people not happy. How about the tens of millions in murica that are not happy or can Canada start taking those northern states?

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    There’s something that I think a lot of people don’t understand about America. They’re currently making a lot of unwise economic decisions and destabilizing the world. They’re not a good ally.

    So you have to ask yourself how we should solve that problem, solve our national security, and if that means that we have to invade the USA, that’s what [insert country here] should do. (Plus we can take their resources.)

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Not the worst choice. They’re the second-happiest country in the world. They have freedom, look down on bigotry. They have nice pastry…

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The second the US attempts to take Greenland we’ll be sanctioned to oblivion by the treaty we helped create. It’s beyond humiliating, but absolutely necessary.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I certainly hope this is just big talk of a delusional megalomaniac who wants to be emperor and some vice president with an intellectual impairment chiming in to either please him and lick boots, or because this is some elaborate strategy to spread fear and ask way too much, and then get a better “compromise”. But yeah, sad to see the civilized world becoming smaller. I hope we stay strong, don’t give in and in the end the good will prevail. We’re going to find out either way.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They are not doing their country right, so we have to take it over and fix it, says nation where eggs are prohibitively expensive.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    the Danes don’t let them develop and explore

    Lmao, it’s not the Danes that aren’t letting the resources be explored, it’s the Greenlanders themselves

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yup. Rare earth minerals are profitable, but ecologically apocalyptic. They don’t want their island to become an ecological disaster zone.

  • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Denmark might not be a good ally to the US in Mr Vance’s bigoted little mind, but for what the US are to Denmark and Greenland, there is a far better term describing a state that wants to annex another state’s territory: Enemy.

  • MeldrikA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The amount of FUD is insane and I’m afraid people are gonna eat it all right up!

    https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-majority-of-greenlanders-reject-trump

    Only 6 percent of Greenlanders want to leave the Danish Realm in favour of the US, and 9 percent are undecided.

    The US can just build more bases in Greenland, instead of closing them down. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_Base

    I don’t think this is about national security. This is about exploiting the natural resources in Greenland.

    • datendefekt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is not about natural resources or national security, but Russian influence in the US government, and trying to normalize imperialism.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s fascist imperialism, because the US is a fascist dictatorship now, and should be treated as such.

    • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s ok, the ones who don’t want to join will get deported as illegal immigrants once they barge in. That, or put into remote reservations in land nobody wants.

  • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Kid that wants to take everyone else’s toys, after being told no by a grown-up: “I hate you! You’re not my friend anymore!”

  • erin@social.sidh.bzh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As an European citizen, I prefer having Danish people as friend than US ones right now (and maybe for the next 4 years)… Reliable friends are always better than unreliable ones…

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Strengthening the alliance by going onto a known propaganda lie factory with more lies and insults about them. Great strategy.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I sincerely hate snow. It’s boring. It’s white. The sun reflecting off it can burn your retinas. It’s wet. You have to wear your entire wardrobe, at the same time, and still be cold. It sticks to your face. It piles too high, you have to shovel it, just to start again, when you’re just done.

    But for this?

    Get me a sled, a team of dogs and a club. I’m more than willing to go to Greenland and stand against the american invader to defend my fellow european.

    Can I get to sample that weird cured shark while I’m there? Or am I getting my references mixed up?