• GetPsyched@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let’s not. Some people’s enjoyment causes a lot of pain for other people, and sometimes i mean literally

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as the government lets people buy trucks, people will buy trucks.

      Rich people jet-setting in their private are far worse than trucks but I rarely hear anyone talking about banning planes.

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is all I see. Instead of literally eating the rich, we’re going to pile on ignorant dudes that buy big trucks. Sure, they’re a problem but they pale in comparison to what corporations and super wealthy are doing.

        It’s mind blowing that it keeps working for the rich.

      • Telemachus93@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        but I rarely hear anyone talking about banning planes.

        Then do it, but in your own post.

        I mean that literally, it would be good to ban private planes and cut down usage of other airplanes drastically. However using that to discredit people talking about other drivers of climate change is just plain whataboutism and sabotaging the movement.