i mentioned only 3rd party voters maybe i misunderstood the op. my bad.
but yes. harris had a year to push against the genocide she supported. this makes her involved in crimes against humanity an not worth running. next dem primary, if the rug is not pulled from us AGAIN, I’ll again vote for the person not ok with genocide.
Unfortunately, if the choices are reduced to “Harris” or “Trump”, the answer - from a position of harm reduction - should be obvious.
We fight the mainstream Dems when we can, where we can. I’m a two-time Bernie voter, and if he’d ran in the 2024 primaries, I would’ve voted for him again. But that’s also not an excuse to let fascists win in the general election. No one was saved by preventing Harris from winning - many people - including many morePalestinians - will die because Trump got into office.
i do not disagree. however i just could not cast my vote for genocide even if she’s less genocide than trump. it’s a binary thing with me. i could not not vote too. sigh.
As a Canadian poet-philosopher once said, “If you choose not to decide/You still have made a choice.”
When presented with the option of lesser evil or greater evil, if you say “Whatever everyone else decides is fine with me”, which is what abstaining or protest voting in a FPTP system with two near-majority support candidates is, you have chosen in favor of the eventual victor. Which was, unfortunately, the fucking fascist in this case.
Every candidate in my lifetime for either party has been in favor of the ongoing Palestinian genocide by Israel, to varying degrees of support. Yet if I were to find myself in 2000, the thought of refusing to cast a vote for Gore over Bush is morally repugnant - Gore supported Israel, but Bush supported Israel more and, with the benefit of hindsight (and probably some contemporary analysis as well), cause millions of additional deaths outside of that as well.
No amount of “Nader was the better candidate” changes what that abstention or protest vote means, in practical terms, of what a citizen is supporting. It means increasing the chances of the worse candidate winning - it means increasing the chances of millions more dying for no gain of substance to anyone - including the people you’re claiming to protest for - and in many cases, this case included, at their further expense.
because harris supports genocide, which outranks all theory about how outcomes happen with other solutions for voting. why were you ok voting for genocide?
I don’t pretend that my vote in 2020 for Biden was anything less than a vote for an admin which unambiguously was going to (and did) support Israel in-line with the policy of previous administrations (and, unfortunately, the vast majority of the American population) - which is repugnant and in support of a genocidal ethnostate. But that vote was also against the immensely more Israel-positive Trump administration which proposed MORE support for genocide than the Biden administration did.
We bear the sin of supporting the lesser evil, because not supporting the lesser evil, when there is only a choice between evils, is in support of the greater evil.
The price of citizenship is responsibility. The price of citizenship is the demand to make imperfect decisions in concert with an imperfect population which will always result in some form of atrocious outcome. The price of citizenship is guilt. If you want to be innocent of political responsibility, well, that’s why oligarchies and autocracies are so intermittently popular.
Rush were MASSIVE libertarian disciples of Ayn Rand who blamed the rise of punk rock on “the failures of socialism”. Maybe they aren’t who you want to be quoting right now.
i mentioned only 3rd party voters maybe i misunderstood the op. my bad.
but yes. harris had a year to push against the genocide she supported. this makes her involved in crimes against humanity an not worth running. next dem primary, if the rug is not pulled from us AGAIN, I’ll again vote for the person not ok with genocide.
Harris was not worth running, I agree.
Unfortunately, if the choices are reduced to “Harris” or “Trump”, the answer - from a position of harm reduction - should be obvious.
We fight the mainstream Dems when we can, where we can. I’m a two-time Bernie voter, and if he’d ran in the 2024 primaries, I would’ve voted for him again. But that’s also not an excuse to let fascists win in the general election. No one was saved by preventing Harris from winning - many people - including many more Palestinians - will die because Trump got into office.
i do not disagree. however i just could not cast my vote for genocide even if she’s less genocide than trump. it’s a binary thing with me. i could not not vote too. sigh.
the dem primary process is always so… “gummy”
As a Canadian poet-philosopher once said, “If you choose not to decide/You still have made a choice.”
When presented with the option of lesser evil or greater evil, if you say “Whatever everyone else decides is fine with me”, which is what abstaining or protest voting in a FPTP system with two near-majority support candidates is, you have chosen in favor of the eventual victor. Which was, unfortunately, the fucking fascist in this case.
Every candidate in my lifetime for either party has been in favor of the ongoing Palestinian genocide by Israel, to varying degrees of support. Yet if I were to find myself in 2000, the thought of refusing to cast a vote for Gore over Bush is morally repugnant - Gore supported Israel, but Bush supported Israel more and, with the benefit of hindsight (and probably some contemporary analysis as well), cause millions of additional deaths outside of that as well.
No amount of “Nader was the better candidate” changes what that abstention or protest vote means, in practical terms, of what a citizen is supporting. It means increasing the chances of the worse candidate winning - it means increasing the chances of millions more dying for no gain of substance to anyone - including the people you’re claiming to protest for - and in many cases, this case included, at their further expense.
i get that. i do. but we “finally” had a candidate that was outwardly anti-genocide.
i wish we had ranked choice voting.
Who? De La Cruz and Stein were both in favor of Ukrainian genocide.
Yeah.
Removed by mod
If you get it, why didn’t you vote for her?
because harris supports genocide, which outranks all theory about how outcomes happen with other solutions for voting. why were you ok voting for genocide?
Because the alternative was more genocide.
I don’t pretend that my vote in 2020 for Biden was anything less than a vote for an admin which unambiguously was going to (and did) support Israel in-line with the policy of previous administrations (and, unfortunately, the vast majority of the American population) - which is repugnant and in support of a genocidal ethnostate. But that vote was also against the immensely more Israel-positive Trump administration which proposed MORE support for genocide than the Biden administration did.
We bear the sin of supporting the lesser evil, because not supporting the lesser evil, when there is only a choice between evils, is in support of the greater evil.
The price of citizenship is responsibility. The price of citizenship is the demand to make imperfect decisions in concert with an imperfect population which will always result in some form of atrocious outcome. The price of citizenship is guilt. If you want to be innocent of political responsibility, well, that’s why oligarchies and autocracies are so intermittently popular.
i enjoyed your replies. thank you.
Removed by mod
So, you don’t get it.
Removed by mod
Rush were MASSIVE libertarian disciples of Ayn Rand who blamed the rise of punk rock on “the failures of socialism”. Maybe they aren’t who you want to be quoting right now.