The man and his former partner are accused of holding two Yazidi girls captive for years while subjecting them to forced labor, abuse and torture before handing them over to other IS members.
I think him being a child sexual abuser and salver is what gets him no mercy. Having a mental disorder doesn’t mean by itself that someone has or will abuse anyone.
Whom and how? I’m really interested. He’s not getting out ever, unless he can convince the people who are going to evaluate him in 15 years that he’s safe to release. Who is going to be helped by seeing his face? How so? Give me an actual non-bs reason please?
As I state right at the beginning: it depends on the context. Most of the time that’s not the case, sure, but it’s still gross.
Pee against a tree is unhygienic and it can damage the tree’s bark, just ask my Japanese maples. Some people can be such pigs, they come across a beautiful, unfenced garden by the roadside, and some incontinent types immediately think about going there to take a leak.
Privacy is important, but there is a reasonable point at which the identity of a convicted criminal becomes a matter of public interest.
Why? Does that help anyone?
Pedos get no mercy
I think him being a child sexual abuser and salver is what gets him no mercy. Having a mental disorder doesn’t mean by itself that someone has or will abuse anyone.
Often pedos need special protection in jail, as other people may get to beat them up or kill them if they discover why they got in jail.
It is very good that they get extra protection; however not many people get sad if the protection fails to work every once in a while.
Yes, it helps.
Whom and how? I’m really interested. He’s not getting out ever, unless he can convince the people who are going to evaluate him in 15 years that he’s safe to release. Who is going to be helped by seeing his face? How so? Give me an actual non-bs reason please?
It would help people who enjoy reading the news stay informed about what is happening in detail.
Maybe. But it’s hard to draw the line. I don’t want to be labeled my life time as a criminal for just peeing outside, as it happens in SOME country.
You shouldn’t be doing it, though. It’s unhygienic. Pee in the toilet, please.
Yes, that is totally the same as being a sex offender….
I didn’t say that. But depending on the context, it could at least be considered exhibitionism and therefore sexual harassment.
Peeing against a tree is hardly sexual harassment, unhygienic or damaging to anybody.
If anything, if you feel sexually harassed while I’m peeing then maybe you got a bit too nearby and are probably sexually harassing me.
As I state right at the beginning: it depends on the context. Most of the time that’s not the case, sure, but it’s still gross.
Pee against a tree is unhygienic and it can damage the tree’s bark, just ask my Japanese maples. Some people can be such pigs, they come across a beautiful, unfenced garden by the roadside, and some incontinent types immediately think about going there to take a leak.
Hi Dad!
I mean… he is sentenced for life. What does it help anyone to know what they look like?
He’ll most likely not spend his whole life in prison, but rather on average about 20 years.