• lokalhorst@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck this guy, but also fuck Bavaria for hanging christian crosses in governmental facilities

  • Edna (dey/sie)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is how criminals should be handled, they should be trialed and sentencend, not deported which helps no one.

    • You@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      For certain reasons, a prison sentence in Germany may not be imposed without review to last for the remainder of a person’s life. Technically he has to be given a chance to be released.

  • stumpelrilzchen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Her former husband had declined to speak in court.

    … and hid behind a piece of paper. At least face the music, coward. Not so mighty and powerful now, are we?

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is completely normal. Criminal courts are usually public, fotos however are only allowed right at the beginning. The defendent has the right, and most use thst right, to not be seen in pictures as ti make resocialisation possible.

      • stumpelrilzchen@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am aware of all that. Still, this gesture is fraught with bitter irony when coming from people who did unspeakable things in the name of some political or religious ideology. Yesterday, they stood proud, doing what they did out in the open, claiming their ideology gave them the right to do it. Today, they cower and hide, not wanting to be connected with their deeds. If a human court of law and a bit of social stigma is all it takes to make your beliefs crumble, maybe your beliefs were shit to begin with, and you could have had this realisation at a fraction of the cost in human suffering. But alas…

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Privacy is important, but there is a reasonable point at which the identity of a convicted criminal becomes a matter of public interest.

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think him being a child sexual abuser and salver is what gets him no mercy. Having a mental disorder doesn’t mean by itself that someone has or will abuse anyone.

        • ranzispa@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Often pedos need special protection in jail, as other people may get to beat them up or kill them if they discover why they got in jail.

          It is very good that they get extra protection; however not many people get sad if the protection fails to work every once in a while.

        • captain_unicode@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Whom and how? I’m really interested. He’s not getting out ever, unless he can convince the people who are going to evaluate him in 15 years that he’s safe to release. Who is going to be helped by seeing his face? How so? Give me an actual non-bs reason please?

          • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It would help people who enjoy reading the news stay informed about what is happening in detail.

        • HairyHarry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe. But it’s hard to draw the line. I don’t want to be labeled my life time as a criminal for just peeing outside, as it happens in SOME country.

          • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You shouldn’t be doing it, though. It’s unhygienic. Pee in the toilet, please.

              • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I didn’t say that. But depending on the context, it could at least be considered exhibitionism and therefore sexual harassment.

                • ranzispa@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Peeing against a tree is hardly sexual harassment, unhygienic or damaging to anybody.

                  If anything, if you feel sexually harassed while I’m peeing then maybe you got a bit too nearby and are probably sexually harassing me.

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean… he is sentenced for life. What does it help anyone to know what they look like?

      • glasratz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        He’ll most likely not spend his whole life in prison, but rather on average about 20 years.