• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Solid argument, but this problem is going to resolve itself because by then the planet will no longer be inhabitable.

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Absolutely you can sell the fruits of AI labour to unemployed people. Give them a universal basic income and a product worth spending that resource on and you can keep your 1% profit while the rest is taxed to support the citizens economy. You’ll still be the richest man alive

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think it could work economically. But a world where humans don’t really need to exist to keep the economy going is a little concerning when the economy is the absolute #1 thing governments and the media seem to care about.

      But why do they? Why isn’t human wellbeing considered more important? Actually IIRC the UK green party was looking to change that as an important metric.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Question:
    How is Big Oil™ going to make a profit when the world is ruined and the population are dead?

    Answer:
    Lol, don’t care. That’s someone else’s problem.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Of all the jobs, CEO is probably one of the easiest jobs for an AI to replace. AI is excellent at being heartless, gaslighting shareholder, and telling people what they want to hear.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The capitalists are far, far beyond forgetting how capitalism… works.

    Just… Henry Ford, pay your employees enough that wow you’ve grown your consumer base!

    This is like macroecon 101 shit.

    So, theyre either ravenously delusionally insane, or, they’re openly declaring themselves the new nobility/aristocracy for the neo-feudalism we now live in.

    … or both. Could be both.

    • No1@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What if the Top 1%'s solution to climate change is to just keep going until 90% (or more) of the poors die off?

      Then you can cut all your production and pollution by 90% (or more)

      It doesn’t have to be all at once. Just let people gradually boil, freeze, drown, starve, die of thirst, whatever.